My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_6
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 5:41:08 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:50:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2005_6
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2005_6.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
454
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
profile at the time of water application. In other words, infiltration is limited by <br />the ability of the soil to take water. 0 <br />Since positive drainage will always be maintained on the landfill surface, no <br />ponding of rain or irrigation waters was included in the analyses. <br />The enclosed analyses of a non -prescriptive cover at the FSL were performed <br />utilizing precipitation data recorded at the Western Regional Climate Center's <br />Stockton Station for the years 1993-2002. The magnitude and duration of the <br />rainfall events were estimated in a fashion believed to conservatively represent <br />typical anticipated application. This included defining the time of day for water <br />application to be 0.4 days (9:36 am) and a water application rate of 60 mm/day. <br />Evapotranspiration - LEACHM requires mean weekly pan evaporation data <br />from which daily potential evapotranspiration (DPET) is calculated as one- <br />seventh of the weekly total pan evaporation. Daily potential transpiration is <br />calculated by multiplying the DPET by a crop cover fraction. Daily potential <br />evaporation is then calculated as the difference between DPET and potential <br />transpiration. For modeling purposes; LEACHM assumes that evapotranspiration <br />starts at 0.3 days (7:12 a.m.) and ends 12 hours later at 0.8 day (7:12 p.m.). <br />During this period, potential evapotranspiration is varied sinusoidally with actual <br />evapotranspiration calculated as a function of the potential evapotranspiration, the <br />profile's soil water status, and specified plant properties. <br />Given a stipulated crop cover fraction of 1.0, LEACHM will calculate that all of <br />the evapotranspiration that occurs is associated with transpiration. However, if a <br />value of 0.0 is entered, all soil moisture losses will be calculated to result solely <br />from evaporation. <br />Pan evaporation data was duplicated from the California Department of Water <br />Resources (DWR) Manteca Station for the same 10 -year period as was <br />incorporated in the rainfall record. <br />4.2.5 VEGETATION CONDITIONS <br />Rather than applying a coefficient to approximate the transpiration effects of <br />plants, LEACHM uses the equation of Nimah and Hanks (1973) to simulate the <br />uptake of water by plant roots. Variables included in the equation and requiring <br />user specification include: crop cover fraction, root water potential (the root <br />potential below which plants are unable to extract water from the soil); root <br />resistance (the depth dependent resistance to upward flow of water within the <br />roots); and the root distribution (expressed as a nodal percentage of all roots). <br />The vegetation evaluated herein included the native shallow rooting grasses and <br />sparse native shrub species, which were estimated to provide a conservative 60% <br />-6- <br />C:\2003-033\EDOM HILL ALTERNATIVE COVER.D006/16/2005 <br />Geologic Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.