ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Comment 6: The JTD, Page 4-5, Section 4.1.3, indicates that Ogden Power Pacific, Inc., operates the methane gas recovery system. A different company now operates the methane recovery system. Revise to reflect actual conditions at the site. Response: Section 4.1.3 has been revised to reflect actual conditions at the site. Comment 7: The JTD, Page 4-8, Section 4.3.1., lists the ADC by types and proposes a limit for each type. The table seems to imply that the facility could accept all ADC types in the quantities listed during a single day. If the limits were added together the total would exceed the 8,668 tons per day. Revise and clarify the information. Response: Section 4.3.1 has been revised to state that in no event will any combination of the above-listed beneficial use materials and refuse exceed the maximum daily limit of 8,668 TPD. Comment 8: The JTD, Page 4-8, Section 4.3.1, lists ADC limits. Are the limits proposed based on site needs? Please explain. If the limits are based on site needs, then they should be expressed as site needs and not limits. Revise to clarify information. Response: The information provided in Section 4.3.1 has been revised to reflect both average and maximum daily needs (in tons) for each beneficial reuse material accepted at the landfill, based on current (2005) waste disposal records. Comment 9: The JTD, Page 4-8, Section 4.3.1, lists waste materials accepted by the facility that are proposed for reuse onsite. Please describe the materials that would be included in the category of"Beneficial Inerts (other than soil)". Revise to include definition. Response: Section 4.3.1 (just below table) has been revised to describe the materials that would be included in the category of"Beneficial Inerts (other than soil)". Comment 10: The JTD, Page 4-8, Section 4.3.1, states that"Consistent with discussions with the LEA, the test for green waste was considered to indicate also the quantity of ash and cement kiln dust necessary, and the test for treated auto shredder residue was considered to indicate also the quantity of C&D ADC necessary." The agreement was that, because the quantities received by the facility were so low, the numbers for the green waste could be substituted for the ash waste. There were no conversations regarding treated auto-shredder residue and C&D ADC having the same or like characteristics. Revise to remove any reference to discussion with the LEA. Response: Section 4.3.1 has been revised to delete the reference to discussions with the LEA. 2 J:\Allied\forwardUTD Amendment\March 2006 JTD-LEA Resp\JTD\Response to LEA comments.doc;5/16/2006