ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

quantities listed during a single day. If the limits were added together the total would exceed the 8,668 tons per day. Revise and clarify the in-formatiQu. 8. The JTD,Page 4-8, Section 4.3.1, lists ADC limits. Are the limits proposed based on site needs? Please explain. If the limits are based on site needs,then they should be expressed as site needs and not limits. Revise to clarify information. 9. The JTD,Page 4-8, Section 4.3.1, lists waste materials accepted by the facility that are proposed for reuse onsite. Please describe the materials that would be included in the category of"Beneficial Inerts (other than soil)". Revise to include definition. 10.The JTD,Page 4-8, Section 4.3.1, states that" Consistent with discussions with the LEA, the test for green waste was considered to indicate also the quantity of ash and cement kiln dust necessary, and the test for treated auto shredder residue was considered to indicate also the quantity of C&D ADC necessary."The agreement was that,because the quantities received by the facility were so low, the numbers for the green waste could be substituted for the ash waste. There were no conversations regarding treated auto- shredder residue and C&D ADC having the same or like characteristics. Revise to remove any reference to discussion with the LEA. 11.The JTD, Page 4-9 Section 4.3.1, indicates that the soil needs for daily, intermediate, and operations layers were added together to derive the maximum contaminated soil limit. The actual site needs should reflect an average and not a peak amount. Revise to include a reasonable average tonnage limit. 12.The JTD, Page 4-9, Section 4.3.2, states "Therefore, on days when less waste is received the site can accept more loads of the beneficial reuse materials." Would the number of additional loads of beneficial reuse material be based on site needs? If the material accepted is for future use, how would it be handled, stored and tracked? Please explain. 13.On Page 4-10, Section 4.5, of the JTD, "weekly averages" is worded such that it appears that the facility is accepting"35,987 tons, six days a week."Revise to reflect actual conditions at the site. 14.The JTD, Page 4-11, Section 4.5, states "discussions with the LEA resulted in the conclusions that ash and cement kiln dust are believed to have similar properties to PGM and that C&D material is believed to have similar properties to treated auto shredder residue." See comment 10 listed above. There was no conversation regarding similar properties. It was based on the fact that the facility uses very little or no ash and cement kiln dust as ADC. Revise to remove any reference to the discussion with the LEA. 15.The JTD, Page 4-12, Section 4.7.1, indicates that the site life estimate is reduced. This issue was raised on the previous JTD amendment review(August 2005). The Environmental Health Department(EHD) asked for an explanation in writing of the change in site life and has not received it. Please provide a written explanation. 16.The JTD, Page 4-13, Section 4.7.2, states "Since a good majority of the waste accepted at Forward Landfill will be construction/demolition type wastes,the inflow rate will be dependent on how much of that type of work is occurring in the area."Please explain this statement and provide supporting documentation. 17.The JTD, Page 6-1, Section 6.1, states "Forward is proposing to extend the hours of operation for the landfill to 4 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., with waste receipt stopping at 9:00 p.m." Revise to reflect current actual hours of operation. Page 2 of 4