ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

It should be noted that in no event will any combination of the above-listed beneficial use materials and refuse exceed the maximum daily limit of 8,668 TPD. To establish the limits for the materials ADC shown above, Forward reviewed 2005 weight and volume records, which provided the maximum daily need for each material. Additionally, the 2005 total for each material was also divided by the permitted number of working days per year to establish the average daily need. Forward also conducted field tests at the landfill to determine refuse-to-cover ratios and in-place densities for those beneficial re-use materials utilized as ADC. the p� F tent with rl'..,-...ssien with the `7"ATTtt� te�l� t$�-�E9�vc-r-rcrci"s�--E@{��ifstcrn��vrcrnri�rsm�na-=�'v�i-rn--err� LFArr the test fer green waste was eensidered te indieate alse the quantity ef ash err eeHsideFed te i r ieate-alse;the quantity of C 4 D DC neeessa-ry.Forward conducted the test for green waste several years ago and documented the results in a December 20, 2002 letter to Ms. Donna Heran, Director, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division. Forward conducted the test for treated auto shredder residue in December 2005. This T-D ndment d,,,aFfl nts the F ults of that tes In addition, the following_procedures were used to provide control for those field tests conducted: 1) a specific ADC material is weighed and loaded into a dump truck; 2) a dozer then spreads the ADC material over the designated field test area (which is measured in square feet); 3) the ADC material is compacted to the minimum required thickness in accordance with 27 CCR or as approved by the LEA; and 4) using the recorded weight of the material, it is determined how much ADC material (in tons) was used to cover the measured test area (in square feet). The results from these tests were utilized to develop the refuse-to-cover ratio and density information presented in Appendix C-1. Sections 4.5 and 6.4.6 discusses the thickness of the various types of ADC reflected in the above maximum limits. To estimate the average need maximum l.Y,,:, of contaminated soil shown above, Forward reviewed current (2005) waste inflow records to calculate a soil quantity. assumed that eentaminated seil was requiFed fer beth eever (daily and inteFFnediate) and eperatiens layer eeRstruetien en the same day. Altheugh there areiTkvny these needs e„ the ,-tee-day was eensi- e•eF 'E—To estimate the maximum limit for contaminated soils, shown above, Forward used the ratio of refuse to cover soil shown in Sections 4.5 and 6.4.7, and the invoiced quantities of operations layer constructed during 2004 and 2005 cell construction. Forward Landfill JTD 4-9 J:\Allied\ForwardUTD Amendment\March 2006 JTD-LEA Resp\JTD\JTD Sec 4 Rev.doc: 05/24/02;Amendment No. 1: 5/22/2006