Laserfiche WebLink
Ask <br /> Ms. Christina Carbajal <br /> March 31, 2006 <br /> Page 5 <br /> • On February 27, 2006, SCS was called out by the BFS Automatic Alarm System. Upon <br /> arrival this same day, SCS observed the shutdown to be attributed to a high exhaust gas <br /> temperature. The BFS was restarted, flow and temperature controller adjusted and <br /> normal operation verified. <br /> On February 14, 2006, SCS performed monthly BFS Condensate Storage Tank Carbon Vent VOC <br /> breakthrough testing. Photo Ionization Detector (PID) results indicated that no VOC's were <br /> detected at the inlet and outlet of the carbon vent. <br /> In addition, as previously reported, SCS observed several areas of paint on the upper portion of <br /> the flare stack, which have begun to discolor and/or flake off the exterior surface. SCS will <br /> continue to inspect these areas and make further recommendations as necessary. <br /> Finally, during the reporting period, the flare exit gas temperature was observed to remain above , <br /> the SJVUAPCD 1400 degree Fahrenheit prescribed operating criteria. The lowest flare exit gas <br /> temperature observed by SCS during our site visits was approximately 1700 degrees Fahrenheit. <br /> All other operating parameters remained within acceptable operating limits. <br /> Site Surface Observation <br /> Visual observation of the landfill surface along the extent of the extraction system is also <br /> performed on a monthly basis. Observations for erosion, surface cracks (that might allow LFG to <br /> escape or promote air intrusion) and settlement around wells, laterals and main pipelines are <br /> conducted. <br /> During this reporting period, no settlement that might adversely impact (e.g., allow condensate <br /> accumulation such that a complete blockage could occur) the LFG collection system operation <br /> was observed, with the exception of the previously mentioned area of flooding on the Austin <br /> section side of the landfill. <br /> Standard Provisions <br /> This report addresses conditions at the subject site during the reporting period only. Accordingly, <br /> we assume no responsibility for any changes that may occur subsequent to our monitoring which <br /> could affect the quantity of LFG at the subject site or adjacent properties. The client is <br /> responsible for ensuring that SCS and on-site personnel are the only parties designated to operate <br /> and adjust the LFG systems. <br />