My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006_4
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:24 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2006_4
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2006_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
554
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The GSE Drainage Design Manual Chapter 4 — Design Methods And Concepts <br />GRI-GC8 recommends using values in the range of 1.1 to 1.3 for biological clogging in the <br />leachate collection system (see Table 4.4). The designer should evaluate the conditions <br />anticipated in the landfill to select an appropriate value for the biological clogging reduction <br />factor. In the absence of available information, the designer is urged to choose a conservative <br />value (i.e., 1.3). <br />GRI-GC8 recommends using values in the range of 1.1 to 1.3 for biological clogging in the <br />leakage detection system (see Table 4.4). The designer should evaluate the conditions anticipated <br />in the landfill to select an appropriate value for the biological clogging reduction factor. In the <br />absence of available information, the designer is urged to choose a conservative value (i.e., 1.3). <br />4.3.4 Creep Reduction Factors, RFcR <br />Performance transmissivity tests are typically conducted for up to 100 hours, as required by GRI <br />test procedure GC8. The decrease in transmissivity with time levels off within 100 hours, and <br />usually much sooner than that, indicating that much of the initial compression and intrusion has <br />already taken place (see Figure 2.5). Reduction factor for creep, RFCR, accounts for the decrease <br />in transmissivity beyond the first 100 hours covered by the performance transmissivity test. The <br />quality of the geonet core, including its structure, thickness, mass and density can have a <br />significant influence on creep reduction factors. Table 4.5 presents creep reduction factors for <br />geonets manufactured by GSE Lining Technology, Inc. Products from other manufacturers can <br />have creep factors different from those given here. <br />Regardless of the type of product, creep increases with increasing overburden stress. For this <br />reason, creep reduction factors for cover applications (i.e., cover drainage and gas removal <br />layers) are significantly smaller than those for liner system applications (i.e., LCRS and LDS). <br />As shown in Table 4.5, a creep reduction factor of 1.1 is adequate for most cover projects. Creep <br />reduction factors should be selected on the basis of normal stress for LCRS and LDS. A <br />conservative value of creep reduction factors may be 2 for landfill liner systems with overburden <br />stress of up to 15000 ps£ <br />Table 4.5 Creep reduction factors (RFcR) for geonets manufactured by GSE Lining Technology, <br />Inc., fNareio and Allen, 20041. <br />r^slll.`i S7 <br />f6 <br />77 <br />48 1000 <br />1.1 <br />240 5000 <br />1.2 <br />478 10000 <br />1.3 <br />718 15000 <br />1.6 <br />4.4 Seepage Forces and Cover Soil Stability <br />The selection of a geosynthetic drainage layer in the previous section (Section 4.3) was based <br />solely on impingement rate (q;) and the resulting required transmissivity, aeq. The use of <br />Equation 4.24 for calculating allowable transmissivity would ensure that liquid head stays within <br />the drainage layer, i.e., all percolation is adequately handled by the drainage layer. Relative to <br />slope stability, this criterion is important to insure that no excess seepage forces need be <br />considered when performing stability calculations. <br />Page 4-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.