My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006_4
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:24 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2006_4
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2006_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
554
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Forward Landfill <br />Summary of Slope Stability Analyses for WMU D-01 <br />4 The purpose of the evaluation was to verify that the minimum static factor of safety for a <br />typical East-West refuse fill slope was approximately equal to or greater than 1.5 and that <br />the seismic deformations for the design earthquake were acceptable. The slip surfaces <br />evaluated involved the liner system. After determining the various static factors of safety <br />for various liner strengths, the yield accelerations were also estimated. The yield <br />accelerations were used to estimate deformations for the design earthquake for the site. <br />Material Properties <br />Four materials were modeled: subgrade, base liner system, side slope liner system, and <br />refuse fill. <br />For subgrade, the properties assumed were a unit weight of 125 pcf, an internal friction <br />angle of 20 degrees, and a cohesion of 400 psf. Because only slip surfaces involving the <br />liner system and the refuse were evaluated, the properties assumed for the subgrade do <br />not affect the results of the analyses. Furthermore, previous slope stability evaluations <br />for the site evaluated slip surfaces into the foundation materials. . These evaluations <br />concluded that slip surfaces involving the foundation had higher factors of safety than <br />movements through the lining system. <br />For refuse fill, the unit weight assumed was 75 pcf. The internal strength was a friction <br />angle of 33 degrees and no cohesion (Kavazanjian et al., 1995). <br />The minimum strength for the base liner system was assumed to be the interface between <br />the HDPE geomembrane and the compacted clay liner. The minimum strength for the <br />liner system along the side slopes was assumed to involve either the interface between the <br />smooth side of the HDPE geomembrane and the geocomposite drain, or the .interface <br />between the HDPE and the GCL. To arrive at a strength envelope, strength values from <br />direct shear tests completed in general accordance with ASTM D5321 for previous cells <br />were plotted and generalized strength envelopes were developed for the Base Lining <br />System and the Side Slope Lining System. The Base and Side Slope Lining System <br />strength envelopes are shown of Figures 1 and 2, respectively. A summary of the <br />previous test results is provided in Table 1. <br />Section Details <br />The proposed liner system for WMU D-01 is shown as Section A on Sheet 4 of the <br />Construction Drawings for VVW D-01 (attached). The final grading plan. in the area of <br />WMU D-01 is attached in Figure 3 and the refuse fill plan for WMU D-01 prior to the <br />construction of future adjacent cells is shown on Figure 4. The excavation plan in the <br />area of WMU D-01 is attached in Figure 5. The cross section evaluated is shown in <br />Figure 6. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.