My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006_4
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:24 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:51:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2006_4
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2006_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
554
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Today all operating municipal solid waste landfills are required to have a composite liner <br />and leachate collection system at their base. Regulations require that these landfill <br />components be constructed over a stable foundation. In many instances however, the <br />underlying subgrade has the potential for differential settlement and collapse. <br />The site selection process for a landfill is complex. Local economies and tax structures, <br />host fees, infrastructure, geology, hydrogeology, nimby (not in my backyard groups) and a <br />variety of other forces and factors influence the process. Often the most challenging site <br />from an engineering perspective turns out to be the selection that best serves the common <br />good. <br />In 1987, a barge was loaded with bailed waste from Islip New York. Many months and <br />many miles later, the barge having found no landfill that would accept the waste, arrived <br />back in Islip. The town council, the consulting engineer and the state regulatory agency <br />all agreed that the best solution was to construct a new landfill above the old capped <br />landfill. This resulted in the first landfill liner support installation. <br />11, <br />In the late 1980's and early 1990's all the states in the country upgraded their landfill liner <br />system regulations. This left many essential landfills out of compliance. While upgraded <br />cells could be constructed on adjoining property, the airspace above the landfill sideslopes ON <br />to be closed was a valuable asset no one wanted to abandon. In many instances, it was in <br />the best interest of all involved to design a "modem" landfill on the sideslope of the landfill <br />to be capped. <br />To date dozens of landfills have been constructed over existing landfills, karst topography <br />and old nine tunnels. The leachate collection systems are monitored to insure that the <br />landfills are operating as designed. A few landfills have installed strain monitoring systems <br />below the new liner system. At the Babylon Landfill in New York and the Sawyer Landfill <br />in Maine, strain readings have indicated that one layer of uniaxial geogrid has reduced <br />liner strains to well below the design limit. <br />This paper reviews the design methodology utilized when landfills are sited above <br />subgrades with the potential for differential settlement and collapse. Subsidence issues <br />and engineering solutions will be discussed. A design example is also presented for <br />review. <br />(1) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.