Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUUI ENMNTS ORDER.NO.R5-2003-0049 <br /> FORWARD INC. AND ALLIED WASTE I DUSTR p-S <br /> FOR OPERATION O <br /> FORWARD CLASS B LANDFU.L <br /> SAN JOAQUlN COUNTY <br /> (see Findings No. 35mid 36). Since volatile organic compounds tie not naturally occuiring <br /> and thus have no background value,they are not amenable to the statistical analysis <br /> procedures contained in Title 27 for the determination of a release of wastes from a UWt. <br /> 31. Sections 20415(e)(8) tend(9) of Title 27 provide for the non-statistical evaluation of <br /> monitoring data that will provide the best assurance of the earliest possible detection;of a <br /> release from a Unit in accordance with §20415(b)(1)(B)2.-4. of Title 27. However, Title 27 <br /> does not specify a specific method for non-statistical evaluation of r.�onitorin9 data. <br /> 32. The Board may specify a non-statistical data analysis method pursuant to Section 20080(a)(1) <br /> of Title 27. Section. 13360(a)(1) of the California Water Code allows the Board to specify <br /> requirements to protect underground or surface waters from leakage from a solid waste site, <br /> which includes a method to provide the best assurance of determining the earliest possible <br /> detection of a release. <br /> 33, In order to provide the best assurance of the earliest possible detection of a release of non- <br /> naturally occurring waste constituents from a Unit, this Order specifies a non-statistical <br /> method for the evaluation of monitoring data. <br /> 34. The specified non-statistical method for evaluation ofrr nitori:ng data provides two criteria <br /> (or triggers) for making the determination that there has been a release of non-naturally <br /> occurring waste constituents from a Unit. The presence of two non-naturally occurring waste <br /> constituents above their respective method detection limit(ML),or one non-naturally <br /> occurring waste constituent detected above its practical quantitation limit(PQL), indicates <br /> that a release of waste from a Unit has occurred. Following an indication of a release, <br /> verification testing will be conducted to determine whether there has been a release from the <br /> Unit, or there is a source of the detected constituents other than the landfill, or the detection <br /> was a false detection. Although the detection of one non-naturally occurring waste <br /> constituent above its MDT is`sufficient to provide for the earliest possible detection of a <br /> release, the detection of two non-naturally occurring waste constituents above the MDL as a <br /> trigger is appropriate due to the higher risk of false-positive analytical results and the <br /> corresponding increase in sampling and analytical expenses from the use of one non-naturally <br /> occurring waste coristiruent above its MDL as a trigger. <br /> GROUNDWATER DEGRADATION <br /> 35. Significant VOC impacts to groundwater including but not Limited to dichloroethane, <br /> dichloroethylenc, tetraclilo7roethylene, and trichloroethylene are associated with the old <br /> Austin Road Landfill, now the;north Unit at Forward landfill. Impacts were initially detected <br /> in 1989, by 1991 evaluation monitoring determined that chlorinated .hydrocarbons impacts <br /> extended as liar as 1,000 feet down-gradient from the Austin Road landfill. A corrective <br /> action was approved in 1991, by 1998 it was apparent that the initial corrective actions had <br /> 6 d O 12090£££9 'ON/99 1 l 'iS/89: £l 90N O l IV (NOW) Nodi <br />