Laserfiche WebLink
likely the result of naturally occurring conditions and therefore not indicative of a release <br /> 41 from the Forward Landfill. <br /> During the second quarter 2007 monitoring period no methane exceeded the regulatory <br /> limit of 5 percent in perimeter soil-pore gas probes at the Forward Unit, suggesting an <br /> overall improvement in landfill gas at the site. Forward continues to install additional <br /> landfill gas extraction wells(as needed), and makes regular adjustments to the landfill gas <br /> extraction system to optimize efficiency of the landfill gas extraction system. <br /> 3.0 AUSTIN UNIT <br /> 3.1 WATER QUALITY MONITORING <br /> 3.1.1 Sampling and Laboratory Analyses <br /> During the second quarter 2007,depth-to-water measurements were recorded in the <br /> groundwater monitoring wells on May 7, 2007 and the Austin Unit's DMP and CAP <br /> groundwater monitoring wells and surface water monitoring stations were sampled by <br /> ATC between May 7 and 9,2007. <br /> A single sample set was collected from each sample point with sufficient liquid and <br /> submitted to BC for analysis of the parameters stipulated in RWQCB Order No. R5- <br /> 2003-0049. Table 2-1 presents the monitoring schedule and summarizes the analytical <br /> methods utilized during the current monitoring period. Water quality samples were also <br /> analyzed in the field for dissolved oxygen, turbidity,temperature,specific conductance, <br /> and pH and recorded on well data sheets. The groundwater monitoring wells, surface <br /> water monitoring points,and leachate were sampled in accordance with the sampling and <br /> analysis procedures detailed in Appendix B. The well data sheets,raw laboratory data, <br /> certificates of analyses, and chain-of-custody records related to the sampling program are <br /> included in Appendix C. The results of both field and laboratory analyses are <br /> summarized in Tables 3-1 through 3-6. <br /> 3.1.2 QA/QC Results <br /> The QA/QC program completed for the second quarter 2007 water quality monitoring <br /> event at the Austin Unit included analyses of three field blanks,three trip blanks, three <br /> laboratory method blanks, and one duplicate sample. The trip, field, and laboratory <br /> method blanks were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and are included with the <br /> laboratory data in Appendix C. The results of the QA/QC program indicate that <br /> chloroform was detected above the PQL in several QA/QC field blanks during the second <br /> quarter 2007 monitoring event. Review of the primary sample results indicates that <br /> chloroform was detected in one of the primary samples collected and was flagged as a <br /> suspected field/laboratory contaminant. <br /> Duplicate samples were collected from CAP well AMW-10 and labeled AMW-DUP. <br /> Duplicate groundwater results are presented along with the primary data in Table 3-2. <br /> D:12007_00431FonvardAusBn_sF07.doc <br /> 8 <br /> GeoLogic Associates <br />