Laserfiche WebLink
To calculate the approximate linear groundwater flow velocity for the site, conservative <br /> assumptions were used, including a hydraulic conductivity of 875 gallons per day per <br /> square foot(0.04 cm/sec) and an estimated effective porosity of 35 percent (CH2M Hill <br /> 2000). An estimated groundwater flow velocity was calculated using Darcy's Law: <br /> Ki cm 0.002 sec– ft <br /> V = — _ [(0.04 —)* 1*2835 Pt; 0.65 ft/day <br /> ne sec 0.35 cm – day <br /> where: V=Groundwater flow velocity. <br /> K=Hydraulic conductivity of the water-bearing unit(0.04 cm/sec). <br /> i=Hydraulic gradient: i�0.002 for the site during the current the fourth quarter 2007. <br /> ne=Effective porosity(ne=0.35);an estimated value. <br /> The groundwater flow rate is calculated to be 0.65 feet/day(237 feet/year). <br /> 3.1.4 Detection Monitoring Program <br /> Field and laboratory results for the DMP wells for the fourth quarter 2007 are <br /> summarized in Table 3-1 and time-series plots are presented in Appendix D. As shown <br /> in Table 3-1, estimated trace VOC constituent concentrations measured included, 1,1- <br /> DCA in the sample collected from wells AMW-13 and AMW-14; and PCE in samples <br /> collected from wells AMW-6 and AMW-12. In addition, cis-l,2-dichloroethene(cis-1,2- <br /> DCE)was measured above the PQL in the sample collected from well AMW-13; PCE <br /> was measured above the PQL in samples collected from well AMW-13 and AMW-14; <br /> and TCE was measured above the PQL in the samples collected from wells AMW-13 and <br /> AMW-14. <br /> For the DMP wells at the Austin Unit, CLs are calculated for the water quality protection <br /> standards (WQPS). The CLs shown in Table 3-1 were calculated by Herst &Associates <br /> using Sanitase, a state-approved statistical software program. Based on a comparison of <br /> the data obtained during the fourth quarter 2007 monitoring period, the following <br /> analytes were found to exceed a CL. The results of the statistical analyses performed by <br /> Herst & Associates are presented in Appendix D. <br /> CONSTITUENT Concentration DMP MONITORING WELL <br /> Limit AMW-2" AMW-6 AMW-7 I AMW-12 I AMW-13 AMw-14 <br /> MONITORING PARAMETERS(m 1) <br /> Barium245 <br /> 0. 4 E=f�09 <br /> liromium,Hexavalent 0.005 0.0056 <br /> VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS( /1) <br /> is-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 0.5 0 2 <br /> Vtrachloroethene 0.5 12 16 <br /> e <br /> iichloroethene 0.5 3.8 1.4 <br /> NOTES: (B)-Background Well. <br /> DMP- Trend Analyses <br /> In order to evaluate changes in water quality in DMP wells at the Austin Unit,historical <br /> trends in groundwater were evaluated beginning in 1994 when the groundwater treatment <br /> D A2007_0043%Forw a rd A ust in_4Q07.d oc <br /> 10 Geologic Associates <br />