My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2008_19
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2008_19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:28 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:53:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2008_19
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2008_19.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
467
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
refuse fill level using a wheel loader2. Minimal equipment loads will, therefore, be applied to the <br /> slope. <br /> 3.1 Seismic Hazard Analysis <br /> Because the Forward Landfill is located in a seismically active area, stability analyses for final grade <br /> conditions must consider seismically induced forces on the refuse fill and slope. The Title 27 <br /> regulations require that landfills that accept designated waste be designed to withstand the maximum <br /> credible earthquake(MCE). <br /> The Forward Landfill,which is located in the Central Valley of California, has a history of low seismic <br /> activity. It is not located in an area of rapid geologic change. The surface projection of the Tracy- <br /> Stockton Fault Zone passes through the City of Stockton, 6.5 miles northwest of the site.This fault zone <br /> is the closest known to the landfill site and does not show evidence of Holocene displacement.No special <br /> containment structures are therefore needed for the landfill to preclude failure due to such events. <br /> A seismic hazard analysis (GeoSyntec,2001)was performed for the Forward Landfill on the basis of <br /> information provided in recent relevant studies of known active and potentially active faults and <br /> earthquake zones in California. Significant active and potentially active faults and seismic source <br /> zones within 100 miles(160 km)of the project site are listed in the analysis. Also listed are the strong <br /> ground shaking duration (Ds) and Peak Horizontal Ground Acceleration (PHGA) estimates for the <br /> MPE and MCE. Both estimates are for a hypothetical bedrock outcrop at the geometric center of the <br /> Forward landfill site. The seismic hazard analysis indicates that the MW 6.4 MPE event on the Great <br /> Valley blind thrust system at a distance of 21mi (34 km) induces the highest bedrock MPE PHGA at <br /> the site. The analysis further indicates that the MW 6.7 MCE event on the Great Valley blind thrust <br /> system at a distance of 21 miles(34 km)induces the highest bedrock MCE PHGA at the site. <br /> The MPE and MCE on the San Andreas fault system are characterized by the same MW 7.9 event at a <br /> distance of 70 miles (112 km). This large-magnitude distant event induces the longest duration of <br /> strong ground shaking at the site. Given a relatively small difference in the estimated bedrock PHGA <br /> and the relatively large difference in estimated DS, the MW 7.9 event on the San Andreas fault system <br /> may be the most damaging earthquake for the Forward Landfill. Therefore, the MW 7.9 event on the <br /> San Andreas fault system should be considered for evaluation of both MPE and MCE design ground <br /> motions at the Forward Landfill along with the appropriate MW event on the Great Valley blind thrust <br /> system. <br /> A target acceleration response spectral envelope was developed for each of the MCE/MPE candidate <br /> events using the median and 84"' percentile acceleration response spectra evaluated using the <br /> Abrahamson and Silva[1997] attenuation model. Based upon the target significant duration of strong <br /> ground shaking and acceleration response spectral envelope for each candidate event, the following <br /> four time histories were selected to represent ground motions at hypothetical bedrock outcrop at the <br /> site: <br /> • the 270-degree component of the Saratoga-Aloha Avenue record from the MW 6.9 Loma Prieta <br /> earthquake, scaled to either 0.19 g to represent the MCE or to 0.13 g to represent the MPE; <br /> • the 315-degree component of the Santa Teresa Hills record from the MW 6.9 Loma Prieta <br /> earthquake, scaled to either 0.19 g to represent the MCE or to 0.13 g to represent the MPE; <br /> 2 The protective operations layer will be placed on the slope using a Caterpillar 966F Series Wheel Loader with a 4.5 cy <br /> bucket. <br /> WMU FU-08 REPORT 3-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.