My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2008_19
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2008_19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:28 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:53:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2008_19
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2008_19.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
467
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 70 and 140 feet of refuse overlying 80 feet of soil overlying bedrock/stiff soil. <br /> - No data are available on site-specific shear-wave velocities for the refuse fill at the <br /> Landfill. Because of the heterogeneous nature of refuse, its dynamic material properties <br /> have not been clearly defined. GeoSyntec modeled the behavior of refuse based on work <br /> by Matasovic and Kavazanjian (1998) at the Operating Industries Inc. (OR) landfill in <br /> Southern California. Matasovic and Kavazanjian (1998)developed shear modulus versus <br /> strain, and damping versus strain relationships based on analyzing and backcalculating <br /> the response of the OD landfill during various earthquakes. The shear wave velocity <br /> assumed for the refuse is based on the velocity profile developed at the OR landfill (Idriss <br /> et al., 1995) which compares well with the shear wave velocity profile developed by <br /> Matasovic and Kavazanjian (1998). For shallow depths, the shear wave velocity <br /> compares well with values presented by Sharma et al. (1990). -The shear wave velocity <br /> used varied between 650 and 970 R/sec. The unit weight of refuse was assumed to be 75 <br /> pcf. <br /> The shear wave velocity of the underlying deposits at the site were assumed based on <br /> compression wave velocities for soil presented by Spangler and Handy(1982). The shear <br /> wave velocities were assumed to vary between 600 and 800 fl/sec. These shear wave <br /> velocities were assumed to increase and vary between 800 and 1,200 R/sec when <br /> modeling varying refuse fill heights above the soil. The variations of shear modulus and <br /> damping ratios with strain for sand are based on Vucetic and Dobry (199 1) for a material <br /> having a plasticity index of zero. <br /> The depth to bedrock was assumed to be 80 feet below the bottom of the excavation for <br /> the cell based on geologic information available for the site. The shear-wave velocity of <br /> the bedrock was assumed to be 3,000 R/sec. <br /> The accelerations at the ground surface for the soil-only column varied between 0.14g <br /> (for M=7.9 time history) and 0.218 (for M=6.7 time histories) depending on the time <br /> history. The accelerations at the ground surface for the refuse-soil column varied <br /> between 0.14g and 0.158 (for M=7.9 time history); and between 0.20g and 0.34g (for <br /> M=6.7 time histories). <br /> The ground accelerations at the top of the refuse-soil columns were then equated to u,,,,x <br /> in the Makdisi and Seed (1977) procedure. Using the Makdisi and Seed (1977) <br /> procedure, seismic deformations for the MCE were estimated to be less than 1 foot which <br /> is acceptable (Seed and Bonaparte, 1992; Sharma and Lewis, 1994). The complete <br /> seismic response analysis, including output from the SHAKE analysis, is attached. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.