Laserfiche WebLink
Based on the slug tests, hydraulic conductivities in the shallow wells appear to <br /> range from 2 x 10.2 to 2 x 103 cm/sec (57 to 5.7 feet per day [ft/d]). <br /> Aquifer pumping tests completed by Camp Dresser McKee Inc. (1999) and <br /> groundwater modeling by Herst & Associates/ Andrews Environmental <br /> Engineering ([HA/AEE], 2001) indicate that the hydraulic conductivity of deeper <br /> well aquifer materials in the area is significantly higher (250 ft/d [0.088 cm/sec]) <br /> than was measured in the slug & bail test results. CH2M Hill also conducted <br /> aquifer pumping tests on the north side of the Austin Unit of the FL and <br /> calculated a hydraulic conductivity of 875 gallons per day per square foot <br /> (0.04 cm/sec). The higher values obtained from pumping tests are consistent <br /> with values listed in the literature (Driscoll, 1986) for medium-to coarse-grained <br /> sands and appears to most closely approximate the types of materials <br /> encountered within water-bearing zones in the deeper monitoring wells at the <br /> site. <br /> Using the conservative hydraulic conductivity value selected by HA/AEE (250 ft/d), <br /> an average groundwater gradient of 0.001 ft/ft, and an estimated effective porosity <br /> of 0.25, the calculated average linear groundwater velocity at the site is: <br /> v= [(K)(h/I)]/n = [(250 ft/d) (0.0025)] / 0.25 = 2.5 ft/d <br /> Where: v =velocity (ft/d) <br /> K = hydraulic conductivity (ft/d) <br /> n = effective porosity <br /> h/I = gradient <br /> 2.7.6 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY <br /> The San Joaquin hydrologic basin has experienced overdraft for many years. In <br /> the Central San Joaquin Irrigation District, which encompasses FL, water levels <br /> have dropped approximately 70 feet since the 1940s. Declining water levels_- - -- ----- - <br /> throughout the Stockton area have induced the eastward movement of poor- <br /> quality water from the delta sediments. Migration of these saline waters had <br /> impacted groundwater as far east as Stockton at the time of a 1981 study by the <br /> ® U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water <br /> Conservation District, 1990). The San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water <br /> Forward Landfill-Project Description 2-12 BRYAN A.STIRRAT S ASSOCIATES <br /> ):\Allied\Forward\2007.0018 Lateral Expansion\Reports\Prof Descrip\021308 Final Proj Des\Sec 2.doc:2/13/2008) <br />