Laserfiche WebLink
For slopes flatter than 6:1, a design method based on soil arching and tension membrane theory was <br /> utilized (Sheriden, T.G.). The soil arching calculations allow the correlation of the shape of the soil <br /> arch to the strength of the soil. Once the shape and dimensions of the arch are known, the uniform <br /> normal pressure over the yielding area at the base of the liner system can be calculated. The tension <br /> membrane equation can then be used to calculate the required geogrid tension at the allowable strain <br /> limit. <br /> 2.3.2 Supported Lining Systems for Slopes Steeper than 6:1 <br /> According to calculations performed for this project (Appendix B), if a lining-to-collapse separation <br /> of approximately 6 feet is maintained, drainage grades upon the 5:1 (H:V) slope will be maintained <br /> and tensile strain in the lining system will be limited to less than 1 percent. Both the geomembrane <br /> and GCL components of the lining system have yield strains greater than 10 percent and are, <br /> therefore,flexible enough to withstand this conservatively calculated tensile strain. <br /> According to site operations personnel,) the former Austin Road Landfill waste slopes have an <br /> existing interim cover that is approximately 1-ft thick. In addition, it is unlikely that refuse that would <br /> create a large void(i.e.rusted refrigerator)would be placed within 1 to 2-ft of the former Austin Road <br /> Landfill final cover slopes. Therefore,to provide a lining-to-collapse separation of 6-ft and given that <br /> at least 2-ft of separation already exists to any potential void, approximately 4-ft of additional <br /> compacted fill material will be placed on the former Austin Road Landfill slopes. The WMU FU-10 <br /> grading plan (Appendix A) was developed to provide the necessary additional compacted subgrade <br /> fill. The combination of the interim cover already in place and the additional compacted subgrade fill <br /> will provide the required compacted fill material thickness below the WMU FU-10 interface lining <br /> system. <br /> 2.3.3 Supported Lining Systems for Slopes Flatter than 6:1 <br /> The grade in the portion of the landfill that connects WMU FU-08 North and WMU FU-10 is <br /> approximately ten percent or less. Because this region overlies the former Austin Road Landfill and <br /> is relatively flat,a geogrid will be placed to support the overlying liners and LCRS. <br /> The geogrid calculations are based on both the short-term tensile strength of the geogrid and the long <br /> term allowable tensile strength. Because the multiaxial yield strength of geomembranes is about 7 to <br /> 10 percent, the specified short term tensile strength of the geogrid is measured at five percent rather <br /> than using the ultimate geogrid tensile strength. This requirement maintains strain compatibility by <br /> allowing the geogrid to achieve the required tensile strength before the overlying geomembrane <br /> deforms beyond its yield strength. <br /> Because the tensile strength of geogrids can degrade over time due to factors such as creep <br /> installation damage, and other environmental factors,the short-term tensile strength of the geogrid is <br /> reduced to calculate a suitable long-term allowable load. The long-term allowable load is compared <br /> to the required tensile load in specifying the geogrid properties. <br /> The final lifts of refuse on the top deck of the former Austin Road Landfill were placed in 2002. <br /> According to site operations personnel,no large metal objects such as refrigerators were placed in the <br /> final refuse lifts. The type of refuse placed was municipal solid waste and some construction and <br /> demolition debris. It was estimated that the largest void that may collapse in this type of waste has a <br /> 1 Based on information provided by Butch Stefani,former Site Manager at the Forward,Inc.Landfill. <br /> WMU FU-10 2-3 <br />