Laserfiche WebLink
WMU FU-10 Interim Fill Condition <br /> As shown on the Construction Drawings (Appendix A), WMU FU-10 is directly south of the former <br /> Austin Road Landfill and directly east of WMU FU-08. The southern boundary is offset from the <br /> main access road. The site development plan(BAS,2001)includes development of future modules to <br /> the east of WMU FU-10. <br /> The slope stability analysis was performed for an interim refuse fill elevation of 150-ft with a 3:1 <br /> slope. The critical slope configuration is in the east-west direction. Other sections were considered <br /> but assessed to be less critical. <br /> As indicated in Appendix B, a minimum factor of safety of 1.6 is obtained for a sliding block shear <br /> surface along the base liner and through the refuse in the east-west direction. A factory of safety of <br /> 1.6 is acceptable for the temporary east-west slope. The maximum refuse fill height and slope for <br /> WMU FU-10 should be re-evaluated based on actual CQA direct shear tests results on the base and <br /> slope liner interfaces. Because the east slope of WMU FU-10 is a temporary slope, a seismic <br /> deformation analysis was not performed. <br /> Forward Landfill Final Grades <br /> As shown on the Construction Drawings (Appendix A), WMU FU-10 is directly south of the former <br /> Austin Road Landfill and directly east of WMU FU-08. The southern boundary is offset from the <br /> main access road. The site development plan(BAS,2001)includes development of future modules to <br /> the east of WMU FU-10. <br /> The slope stability analysis was performed for a maximum Forward Landfill refuse fill elevation of <br /> 200-ft for a NE to SW section running along the intersection of the south and west facing final refuse <br /> fill slopes. The effective slope is approximately 4:1. <br /> As indicated in Appendix B, a minimum factor of safety of 2.0 is obtained for a sliding block shear <br /> surface along the base liner and through the refuse in the NE-SW direction for the effective 4:1 final <br /> slope. A factory of safety of 2 is acceptable for permanent slopes. The maximum refuse fill height <br /> and slope for WMU FU-10 should be re-evaluated based on actual CQA direct shear tests results on <br /> the base and slope liner interfaces. <br /> Because the NE-SW slope of WMU FU-10 is a permanent slope, a seismic deformation analysis was <br /> performed. The SHAKE computer program was used to predict the response of the landfill to the input <br /> base rock motions. To model the dynamic response of the critical cross section,the following columns <br /> were used: <br /> • 80-feet of soil overlying stiff soils/bedrock. This column was used to calibrate the shear <br /> wave velocities assumed for the soil. After the results at ground surface were considered to <br /> be reasonable,the refuse was modeled above the soils for the remaining analysis. <br /> • 70 and 140 feet of refuse overlying 80 feet of soil overlying stiff soils/bedrock. <br /> The accelerations at the ground surface for the soil-only column varied between 0.14g(for Mw 7.9 time <br /> history)and 0.21 g(for Mw 6.7 time histories). The accelerations at the ground surface for the refuse-soil <br /> column varied between 0.14g and 0.15g(for Mw 7.9 time history)and between 0.208 and 0.30g(for Mw <br /> 6.7 time histories). <br /> The ground accelerations at the top of the soil-refuse columns were equated to fl.in the Makdisi and <br /> Seed(1977)procedure to estimate deformations.The yield acceleration for the critical section is 0.185g. <br /> WMU FU-10 REPORT 3- <br />