Laserfiche WebLink
well by subtracting the depth-to-water measurement from the top-of-casing reference <br /> elevation. The current groundwater elevation data for the Forward Unit is summarized in <br /> Table 2-3. <br /> The groundwater elevation data obtained during the fourth quarter 2011 monitoring <br /> period were used to generate the groundwater elevation contour map shown on Figure <br /> 2-1, which indicates that groundwater generally flows to the northeast towards the Austin <br /> Unit, at an average hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.003 ft/ft. <br /> To calculate the approximate linear groundwater flow velocity for the site, conservative <br /> assumptions were used, including a hydraulic conductivity of 875 gallons per day per <br /> square foot(0.04 cm/sec) and an estimated effective porosity of 35 percent(CH2M Hill <br /> 2000). An estimated groundwater flow velocity was calculated using Darcy's Law: <br /> Ki CM 0.003 sec- ft <br /> V [(0.04 —)* —]* 2835 — � 0.972 ft/day <br /> ne sec 0.35 em - day <br /> where: V=Groundwater flow velocity. <br /> K=Hydraulic conductivity of the water-bearing unit(0.04 cm/sec). <br /> i=Hydraulic gradient: i�0.003 for the site during the fourth quarter 2011. <br /> n,=Effective porosity(ne=0.35);an estimated value. <br /> The groundwater flow rate is calculated to be 0.972 feet/day(355 feet/year). <br /> 2.1.4 Detection Monitoring Program <br /> Field and laboratory results for the Forward Unit groundwater monitoring wells for the <br /> fourth quarter 2011 monitoring period are summarized in Table 2-2 and time-series plots <br /> are presented in Appendix D. As shown in Table 2-2, diisopropyl ether(DIPE) was <br /> measured above the practical quantitation limit(PQL) in the sample collected from well <br /> MW-2A. In addition, the following VOCs were measured at estimated trace <br /> concentrations (between the method detection limit [MDL] and the PQL) during the <br /> fourth quarter 2011 monitoring period, DIPE in the sample collected from well MW-2A; <br /> acetone and dichlorodifluoromethane (DCDFM) in the sample collected from well <br /> MW-10; and 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE), <br /> DCDFM,tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), and trichlorofluoromethane <br /> (TCFM) in the samples collected from well MW-14. <br /> On behalf of Forward Inc., GLA prepared a letter report dated February 14, 2001 <br /> (RWQCB Case No. 2209),to assess the source and potential impacts of low-level VOCs <br /> in groundwater adjacent to the Forward Landfill. The letter report concluded that the <br /> sporadic detection of low-level VOCs in groundwater(and lysimeter samples) at the <br /> Forward Unit are most likely due to landfill gas from unlined unit WMU-B. The <br /> particular VOCs detected in samples during the current monitoring period appear to <br /> support this conclusion. Forward has continued to minimize gas related impacts to <br /> groundwater by limiting interim fill areas that promote ponding of water. Furthermore, <br /> c:\mu-ooso\FA_4QILdoc Jr Geo-Logic Associates <br />