Laserfiche WebLink
Caroll Mortensen <br />January 13, 2012 <br />Page 5 <br />In addition, both the SWFP Revision and the Landfill Expansion Project <br />contemplate changes in landfill operations, including an increase in the number and <br />frequency of truck trips that would access the landfill. See 2010 DEIR at I-1. While the <br />2010 DEIR acknowledges that the Landfill Expansion Project would increase daily truck <br />traffic from 620 to 960 daily vehicles2, it never discloses that Forward also proposes to <br />allow trucking operations on Sundays. Nor does the SWFP ND acknowledge Forward's <br />plan to increase the number of daily round -trips to 960. By purposely omitting reference <br />to these critical landfill operational components, the lead agency has vastly <br />underestimated the Project's environmental impacts. Moreover, by considering the <br />SWFP Revision prior to, and in isolation of, the Landfill Expansion Project, the LEA has <br />improperly segmented environmental review. <br />Consequently, Calrecycle should deny the SWFP Revision until such time <br />as an EIR is prepared that analyzes the environmental impacts from the complete Landfill <br />Expansion Project. Only then can the public and decision -makers be adequately <br />informed about the environmental repercussions of all proposed landfill activities and <br />meaningfully consider alternatives and mitigation measures to address the Project's <br />adverse environmental impacts. Inasmuch as a revised DEIR for the Expansion Project is <br />imminent, we believe it prudent to await the completion of the environmental review <br />process for the Expansion Project. <br />II. AN EIR MUST BE PREPARED THAT ANALYZES THE POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. <br />An agency must prepare an EIR for a proposed project whenever <br />substantial evidence in the administrative record supports a "fair argument" that the <br />project may have significant impacts on the environment. Guidelines §§ 15064(a)(1), <br />(f)(1). A fair argument clearly can be made that the Project, which will result in the loss <br />of 184 acres of agricultural lands and increase operations on days the facility does not <br />currently operate, will have potentially significant environmental impacts. For the <br />reasons discussed below, an EIR is required. <br />A. The SWFP Revision Will Have Potentially Significant Impacts on the <br />Region's Agricultural Resources. <br />2 These are round -trips, not one-way trips. One-way trips would increase from <br />1,260 to 1,920. <br />SHUTE MIHALY <br />--WEINBERGERu-P <br />