My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_4
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:43 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2013_4
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2013_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FORWARD LANDFILL <br /> NON-WATER CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN <br /> 0 4.1.5 Impacts from Slope Failure <br /> 4.1.5.1 Slope Stability Analysis Procedure <br /> To satisfy the requirements of CalRecycle, the existing landfill slopes were evaluated for <br /> dynamic stability by using the calculated horizontal site acceleration of the MCE event. The <br /> calculations for the horizontal acceleration from the MCE event at the site were previously <br /> performed by GLA (2008a) and will be summarized later in this report. <br /> The topographic survey performed by Ausenco Vector(2011) was used as a base map to <br /> evaluate the dynamic slope stability of the existing landfill slopes. An evaluation of the static <br /> stability of the site slopes was not performed since dynamic stability is necessary for this <br /> analysis. The limits of the active landfill footprint are presented in Figure 2. Subsurface <br /> geotechnical information was provided by laboratory testing of soil samples obtained from <br /> several borings and CPTs advanced on the site by GLA(2008a and 2008b). The location of the <br /> site borings and CPTs are also presented on Figure 2. <br /> Five cross sections were prepared to evaluate existing landfill slope stability. Cross section A-A' <br /> was generated to represent the unlined area of the highest landfill slopes in the former Austin <br /> Road Sanitary Landfill area. Cross section B-B' was prepared to represent a lined landfill slope <br /> condition along the highest landfill slope of the Austin Road Sanitary Landfill portion of the site. <br /> Cross Sections C-C' and D-D' were prepared to evaluate the stability of the lined landfill slope at <br /> the area of the highest slope of the southern portion(Forward Landfill) of the site. Cross section <br /> E-E' was constructed to evaluate the stability of the buried Ash Pit cover. The approximate <br /> locations of the cross-sections are presented on Figure 2. Landfill configurations were <br /> constructed from review of plans prepared by R.W. Beck(1993) for the northern(Austin) <br /> landfill portion and conversations with Lewis Engineering and plans by BAS (2001) for the <br /> southern(Forward) landfill portion. <br /> 4.1.5.2 Geotechnical Parameters <br /> The individual components of the composite liner system were previously presented in earlier <br /> sections of the report. The soil materials at the site include: native alluvial soils of the Victor <br /> Formation, municipal solid waste (MSW) fill, textured and smooth high-density polyethylene <br /> (HDPE), non-woven(NW) geotextile, and compacted cover/fill materials. <br /> Geotechnical parameters required for analysis include unit weight and shear strength parameters <br /> ® (angle of friction and cohesion). For the native and compacted cover soils, the angle of friction <br /> M:\2011-012MWFA REPORT.DOCX 1 1 Geo-Logic Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.