Laserfiche WebLink
The groundwater elevation data obtained during the first quarter 2013 monitoring period <br /> were used to generate the groundwater elevation contour map shown on Figure 2-1, <br /> which indicates that groundwater generally flows to the northeast towards the Austin <br /> Unit, at an average hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.003 ft/ft, although a localized <br /> southwest gradient of 0.012 to 0.014 was noted along the northeast perimeter of the <br /> Forward Unit. <br /> To calculate the approximate linear groundwater flow velocity for the site, conservative <br /> assumptions were used, including a hydraulic conductivity of 875 gallons per day per <br /> square foot(0.04 cm/sec) and an estimated effective porosity of 35 percent(CH2M Hill <br /> 2000). An estimated groundwater flow velocity was calculated using Darcy's Law: <br /> Ki cm 0.003 sec– ft <br /> V = —_ [(0.04 —)* ]*2835 0.972 ft/day <br /> ne sec 0.35 cm – day <br /> where: V=Groundwater flow velocity. <br /> K=Hydraulic conductivity of the water-bearing unit(0.04 cm/sec). <br /> i=Hydraulic gradient: i;:z�0.003 for the site during the first quarter 2013. <br /> n,=Effective porosity(n,=0.35);an estimated value. <br /> The groundwater flow rate is calculated to be 0.972 feet/day(355 feet/year). <br /> Detection Monitoring Program <br /> ram <br /> Field and laboratory results for the Forward Unit groundwater monitoring wells for the <br /> first quarter 2013 monitoring period are summarized in Table 2-2. <br /> Non-Statistical Data Anal <br /> The non-statistical VOC water analyses performed on the DMP well data indicates that <br /> there were two non-statistical exceedances for VOCs. The non-statistical exceedances <br /> were identified at well MW-2A as a result of the detection of diisopropyl ether(DIPS) <br /> above the PQL and at well MW-10 due to the detection of two VOCs (acetone and <br /> dichlorodifluoromethane [DCDFM])at estimated trace concentrations. However,trend <br /> analyses indicate that there were no statistically significant increasing temporal trends <br /> calculated for the VOCs detected in wells MW-2A and MW-10. Trend analyses are <br /> included in Appendix D. On behalf of Forward Inc., GLA prepared a letter report dated <br /> February 14, 2001 (RWQCB Case No. 2209), to assess the source and potential impacts <br /> of low-level VOCs in groundwater adjacent to the Forward Landfill. The letter report <br /> concluded that the sporadic detection of low-level VOCs in groundwater(and lysimeter <br /> samples) at the Forward Unit are most likely due to landfill gas from unlined unit WMU- <br /> B. The particular VOCs detected in samples during the current monitoring period appear <br /> to support this conclusion. Forward has continued to minimize gas related impacts to <br /> groundwater by limiting interim fill areas that promote ponding of water. Furthermore, <br /> CA2013-0021\FA_1Q13Aoc 5 Geo-Logic Associates <br />