Laserfiche WebLink
4.2.1 COVER CONFIGURATION <br />The first step in using the LEACHM model involves definition of the soil profile. This is <br />accomplished by defining the total thickness of the profile and a nodal or profile segment <br />thickness. Modeling of the proposed alternative final cover system at the FSL was <br />completed assuming a total final cover thickness of 4.0 feet. As a result, a total profile <br />thickness of 1220 -mm (4.0 feet) was stipulated, as was a nodal frequency of 152.5 -mm <br />(6 -inches). This yielded a total of 8 profile segments or nodes and the analysis assessed <br />water flux at each of these nodes ten times a day throughout the modeling period. <br />4.2.2 BOTTOM BOUNDARY CONDITIONS <br />One of the most essential parameters included in the analysis a final cover proposed over <br />municipal solid waste is definition of the bottom boundary condition of the final cover <br />soil section. Based on recent large-scale demonstration project data, it is clear that the <br />most realistic characterization of the bottom boundary is represented by the constant <br />potential condition (GLA, 1999, GLA 2001, Lass et. al., 2000, Lass et. al., 2001). In this <br />case, it is assumed that there is a source of moisture available within the landfill (e.g. high <br />humidity landfill environment) that would represent a continuous source of moisture (and <br />therefore constant potential) within the waste and near the base of the cover section. In <br />addition to being the most realistic, this bottom boundary condition also allows for more <br />effective characterization of two directional moisture movement and allows for the <br />extraction of moisture through the final cover if drying conditions predominate (i.e., <br />downward migration is calculated when the final cover moisture content is high and <br />allows for extraction of water from the landfill [i.e., drying of the waste] when the <br />moisture in the final cover is low). As a result, in estimating the nature of flow through <br />the bottom boundary of the final cover section at the FSL, the constant potential boundary <br />condition was utilized. <br />4.2.3 SOIL COVER CHARACTERISTICS <br />For each node or interval in the defined profile, LEACHM requires input of specific soil <br />properties including: remolded dry bulk density; initial matric potential and soil moisture <br />content; Campbell's "a" and "b" coefficients <br />(Campbell, G.S., 1974), and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Porosity is then calculated <br />as a function of the stipulated specific gravity of the soils and their remolded dry bulk <br />density. <br />Prior to initiation of modeling, the existing cover and the proposed borrow source soils <br />were tested for grain size (ASTM D-422), maximum density/optimum moisture (ASTM <br />D-1557), hydraulic conductivity (ASTM D 5084), and matric potential testing (ASTM D- <br />6836) (Table 1). Table 2 lists the soil characteristics actually incorporated in modeling. <br />It should be noted that for modeling purposes, the soil characteristics of a long-term <br />weathered soil profile similar to the existing interim cover were utilized. Campbell's "a" <br />and "b" coefficients were calculated using the LEACHM RETFIT program and are based <br />on soil grain size distribution, bulk density, matric potentials and hydraulic conductivity. <br />-4- <br />C:00050082WOR WARD/ForwerdCOVER.DOa7/t3nUU$ <br />GeoLogic Associates <br />