Laserfiche WebLink
STABILITY ANALYSIS <br />WMU FU -14 FORWARD LANDFILL <br />PROBLEM: <br />Assess the static stability of the refuse over the base and side slope lining system for WMU FU -14 at the <br />Forward Landfill. Because WMU FU -14 is an interior module, there are no slopes on this module that will <br />coincide with the final landfill grades. Seismic analyses are, therefore, not required. <br />GIVEN: <br />These calculations have been previously performed for the prior WMUs at the site and they have been <br />found to have a satisfactory factor of safety and seismic deformation. The analysis for WMU FU -14 is <br />similar to WMUs FU -03, ART -03, FU -04, FU -05, FU -06, FU -08, FU -10, FU -13 and various other WMUs <br />at the site. <br />1. The planned maximum elevation of refuse in WMU FU -14, prior to the development of adjacent <br />waste management units, is 150 ft MSL. This elevation is based on 3:1 slopes on the south and east. <br />The west slope will be filled against the existing WMU FU -10 refuse slope. The north slope will be <br />filled against the existing WMU FU -13 refuse slope. <br />2. Development is planned to the east and south of WMU FU -14. These slopes are, therefore, temporary <br />and will eventually be buttressed by adjacent slopes. <br />STABILITY ANALYSIS SECTIONS AND CRITERIA: <br />1. The critical cross section for the stability analysis under the maximum interim filling configuration <br />0 (refuse fill elevation 150 ft) is in the E -W direction along the base liner. <br />2. For interim slopes, a static factor of safety of 1.3 is typically considered acceptable. <br />SUMMARY OF STABILITY ANALYSIS RESULTS <br />1. The minimum factor of safety for WMU FU -14 under the planned interim fill configuration (refuse <br />elev. 150 ft) is 1.57. The critical failure surface extends from approximately the crest of refuse, <br />through the refuse mass, and then along a portion of the base liner, daylighting at the toe of slope. <br />Both the base liner interfaces (clay/HDPE and cushion geotextile/HDPE) were analyzed but the <br />cushion geotextile/HDPE condition was found to be more critical. <br />2. The stability analysis assumes the base liner interface shear strengths between the clay and textured <br />HDPE are a friction angle of 18 degrees and an apparent cohesion of 0 psf and a friction angle of 10 <br />degrees and an apparent cohesion of 1,000 psf for normal load ranges from 0 to 6,500 psf and from <br />6,500 to 17,000 psf, respectively. The base liner interface strength between the cushion geotextile and <br />the textured HDPE geomembrane is as follows: <br />Normal Stress (psf) <br />Minimum Shear Stress (psf) <br />2,000 <br />700 <br />4,000 <br />1,110 <br />8,000 <br />1,950 <br />12,000 <br />2,780 <br />The interface shear strength envelopes for the critical surfaces are included with the <br />calculations. <br />