Laserfiche WebLink
Forward's logs of liquid levels in the two Class 11 impoundments were reviewed for the <br />period between 2005 and 2012. As would be expected, the maximum depth of leachate <br />in the ponds occurred at the end of the wet season, generally in May. Leachate levels in <br />the ponds decreased through the summer due to evaporation. In general, the ponds were <br />empty or near empty by the fall or early winter. The maximum depth of leachate <br />occurred in May 2006 and was 7.5 -ft in WMU F -North and 7.85 -ft in WMU F -West. <br />2.0 POND DEPTH MANAGEMENT PLAN <br />As noted in Table 1, precipitation and leachate generation increase liquid levels in WMU <br />F -North an average of 2.73 -fit and in WMU F -West an average of 3.51 -ft. The average <br />value for precipitation was obtained from the Stockton WSO climate station for a period <br />from October 1948 to March 2013. The average leachate generation was based on site <br />records from 1991 to 2012 and includes the EI Nino years of 1996 and 1998. Evaporation <br />decreases the liquid level by an average of 6.53 -ft in both ponds. Therefore, evaporation <br />exceeds the total leachate generation and precipitation. <br />Because the cannery season starts in .lune, when the ponds have typically been near their <br />peak levels, Forward is proposing to manage pond capacity by maintaining sufficient <br />freeboard through the cannery season to account for the following year of precipitation <br />and leachate gencration. This Vvould mean that, including the required two -ft of freeboard <br />in each pond, the total freeboard in NVMU F -North would be a minimum of 4.73 -ft (2 -ft <br />Plus 2.73 -ft) and the freeboard in WMI! F -West would be a minimum of 5.51 -ft (2 -ft plus <br />3.51 -ft). For WMU F -North, the maximUmn depth of liquid in the pond would be 5.27 -ft <br />(10 -ft pond depth minus 4.73 -ft) and for WMU F -West would be 9.74 -ft (15.25 -ft pond <br />depth minus 5.51 -ft). <br />Since 1999, when WMU F -North was constructed, Forward has had more than sufficient <br />capacity to manage leachate onsite. With the addition of WMU F -West in 2003, Forward <br />is also likely to have sufficient capacity to accommodate precipitation and leachate <br />generation in future peak years. However, if necessary during a future peak precipitation <br />and leachate generation year, Forward will dispose leachate at the Stockton Wastewater <br />Treatment Plant, as was done during the El Nino year of 1998. <br />3.0 Class II Impoundment Compatibility <br />Forward performed an analytical test of the cannery rinse water in 2011. Value <br />Engineering evaluated the results of the cannery rinse water analytical tests and found <br />that they were compatible with the Class 11 impoundment liner. The Value Engineering <br />report, which includes the analytical test results, is included in Attachment B. <br />4.0 Odor and Sludge Accumulation Management Plan <br />In general, Forward manages onsite odors in accordance with its Odor Management <br />Control Plan (see Attachment C). For the cannery rinse water, special controls will be <br />implemented due to the potential for cannery rinse water to be particularly malodorous. <br />