Laserfiche WebLink
2015 Annual Correctie Action Evaluation Report <br />Austin Road Unit. Forward Landfill — Manteca California Paee 4 <br />second quarter 2015. There were reportedly no notices of violation (NOVs) issued to the facility for <br />cover -related issues from the third quarter 2014 through second quarter 2015. <br />5.0 Landfill Gas Monitoring Results <br />The gas collection and control system at the Forward Landfill complex includes 194 extraction wells, a <br />flare for thermal destruction (Flare A-2), a backup flare (Flare A-1), and a methane gas recovery facility <br />that generates electricity. <br />The Forward Landfill complex includes 27 perimeter landfill gas monitoring probes spaced 1,000 feet <br />apart, pursuant to Title 27 of the CCR These probes include multi-level monitoring of shallow and <br />deep intervals. Several of the probes also include monitoring of a medial interval. Combined, the <br />perimeter monitoring system includes 77 individual monitoring points, plus additional temporary gas <br />probes. Thirteen of the 27 permanent probes are located around the perimeter of the ARU: GP -13 <br />through GP -25. These 13 probes comprise 39 of the complex's 77 individual monitoring points: <br />Landfill gas sample results for the third quarter 2014 through second quarter 2015 at ARU are provided <br />in Appendix C. These results were provided by SCS Field Services (SCS). ARU gas monitoring <br />probes GP -13 through GP -25 are monitored quarterly for methane, carbon dioxide, oxygen, balance <br />gas, and static pressure. Landfill gas results are generally consistent from quarter to quarter at the ARU. <br />Methane was not detected in any of ARU monitoring probes above a concentration of 0.2% during the <br />third quarter 2014, fourth quarter 2014, first quarter 2015, or second quarter 2015. <br />Given the consistency of the gas monitoring probe data over the past year and the lack of detectable <br />methane above 0.2%, it can be concluded that the gas collection system continues to operate <br />effectively. Information supplied by the facility indicates that several enhancements to the landfill gas <br />extraction system have been made in the past thirteen years. These include the installation of additional <br />landfill gas extraction wells, plus the installation of a soil vapor extraction system and temporary gas <br />probes along the western edge of the Forward Landfill. <br />6.0 Comparison of Current to Modeled Groundwater Quality <br />The August 8, 2001 Revised Engineering Feasibility Study for Austin Road Landfill (hereafter, EFS) <br />presented projected isoconcentration contour maps for select VOCs in groundwater based on computer <br />modeling simulations. These simulations projected how the concentrations of individual VOCs could <br />potentially change following the initiation of recharge within the artificial basin. The EFS presented <br />projected maps corresponding to each year following the initiation of recharge, for up to nine years. <br />The four VOCs that were modeled were tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, and <br />vinyl chloride. <br />In past Annual Corrective Action Evaluation Reports, these projected isoconcentration maps were <br />compared to maps based on contemporary data, collected from the same monitoring wells utilized in <br />modeling. However, the EFS simulations projected that none of the modeled VOCs would be detected <br />above 1 ug/L after nine years of recharge. Use of the recharge basin was initiated in May 2003, and the <br />May 2015 results therefore correspond to approximately 12 years after initiation of the recharge basin. <br />Accordingly, there are no projected isoconcentration maps available for comparison to current results. <br />For reference purposes, this report presents current isoconcentmtion maps for the four modeled VOCs. <br />These maps are based on second quarter (May/June) 2015 monitoring results and are presented in <br />)�,IST & ASSOCIATES, INC <br />