My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2015_2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2015_2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 2:53:52 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:59:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2015_2
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2015_2.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water Quality Monitoring Report <br /> Forward Landfill <br /> 2015 monitoring period. Vadose zone monitoring stations were also reported dry or <br /> had an insufficient volume of soil-pore liquid to sample. <br /> 3.0 AUSTIN UNIT <br /> 3.1 Water Quality Monitoring <br /> 3.1.1 Sampling and Laboratory Analyses <br /> Del-Tech performed routine monitoring of DMP, CAP, EMP wells at the Austin Unit <br /> during the third quarter 2015 monitoring period. Depth-to-water measurements were <br /> recorded in the groundwater monitoring wells on September 1 and 3, 2015 and all <br /> groundwater monitoring wells and domestic wells were sampled between September 1 <br /> and 3, 2015. Vadose zone and surface water monitoring stations were reported dry <br /> during the monitoring period. During the monitoring period, Del-Tech reported that <br /> there was insufficient water to collect samples in groundwater monitoring wells AMW-4 <br /> and AMW-5R. <br /> Samples were collected from each sample point with sufficient liquid and submitted to <br /> BC for analysis of the routine monitoring parameters stipulated in RWQCB Order No. 85- <br /> 2014-0006. Table 2-1 presents the monitoring schedule and summarizes the analytical <br /> methods utilized during the current monitoring period. Wells AMW-1, AMW-7, AMW- <br /> 10, and AMW-13 were also sampled for total arsenic, nitrogen, iron, and manganese for <br /> the CWLAM program. Water quality samples were also analyzed in the field for ORP, <br /> turbidity, temperature, specific conductance, and pH and recorded on well data sheets. <br /> The groundwater monitoring wells, surface water monitoring locations, and leachate <br /> sumps/monitoring points were sampled in accordance with the sampling and analysis <br /> plan detailed in Appendix E. The well data sheets, raw laboratory data, certificates of <br /> analyses, and chain-of-custody records related to the sampling program are included in <br /> Appendix F. Field and laboratory analyses are summarized in Tables 3-1 through 3-7 and <br /> cumulative tabulated data for all monitoring points and constituents for groundwater, <br /> unsaturated zone, leachate, and surface water are presented in Appendix F. <br /> 3.1.2 QA/QC Results <br /> The QA/QC program completed for the third quarter 2015 water quality monitoring <br /> event at the Austin Unit included analyses of two trip blanks, one field blank, laboratory <br /> method blanks, and one duplicate sample (well 8106-A). The field, equipment, and trip <br /> blanks were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and method blanks were analyzed <br /> for all required analyses. The results of the QA/QC program indicate that calcium was <br /> measured at a trace concentration in one of the method blanks. However, this very low <br /> concentration did not affect the interpretation of primary sample results. Results from <br /> the duplicate groundwater sample collected from well 8106-A, presented along with the <br /> primary data in Table 3-5, yielded good correlation with quantifiable constituents having <br /> M:\2015.0014\FA 3Q15.docx 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.