My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2017_3
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2017_3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 10:03:16 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:59:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2017_3
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2017_3.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
603
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water Quality Monitoring Report <br />Forward Landfill <br />2.1.2 QA/QC Results <br />The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program completed for the fourth quarter 2016 <br />water quality monitoring event included analyses of two trip blanks, one equipment blank, one <br />field blank, laboratory method blanks, and one duplicate sample (MW -21). The field blanks <br />were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and method blanks were analyzed for all of the <br />analytes included in the monitoring program. The results of the QA/QC program indicate that <br />no VOCs were detected in the trip, field, equipment, or method blanks. Sodium was measured <br />at a trace concentration in one method blank analyzed with groundwater samples. However, <br />sodium was measured at a very low concentration that did not affect the interpretation of <br />primary sample results. The results of the duplicate sample collected from well MW -21 yielded <br />good correlation with a relative percent difference (RPD) less than 8 percent. Review of the <br />sampling dates and laboratory analytical certificates indicates that all laboratory analyses were <br />completed within required holding times. Based on the results of the laboratory QA/QC <br />analyses, it is concluded that the laboratory data generated for the fourth quarter 2016 <br />monitoring period are acceptable and the water quality samples collected from the Forward <br />Unit appear to be representative of water quality at the site. <br />2.1.3 Groundwater Elevations and Contours <br />Prior to purging and sampling, each well was sounded for water depth using a weighted <br />electronic sounder to an accuracy of 0.01 foot, and the static water level was recorded on a <br />Well Data Sheet (Appendix F). The groundwater elevations were calculated for each well by <br />subtracting the depth -to -water measurement from the top -of -casing reference elevation. The <br />current groundwater elevation data for the Forward Unit is summarized in Table 2-3. <br />The groundwater elevation data obtained on November 14, 2016, were used to generate the <br />groundwater elevation contour map shown on Figure 2-1 for the fourth quarter 2016 <br />monitoring period, which depicts groundwater beneath the northern half of Forward Unit <br />generally flowing to the northeast at a hydraulic gradient of 0.002 ft/ft, while groundwater <br />beneath the southern half of Forward Unit generally flowing to the south-southeast at a <br />hydraulic gradient of 0.003 ft/ft, potentially controlled by agricultural well pumping on adjacent <br />properties. <br />To calculate the approximate linear groundwater flow velocity for the Forward Unit, <br />conservative assumptions were used, including a hydraulic conductivity of 875 gallons per day <br />per square foot (0.04 cm/sec) and an estimated effective porosity of 35 percent (CH2M Hill, <br />2000). An estimated groundwater flow velocity was calculated using Darcy's Law: <br />Project No. 2016.0007 l Water Quality Monitoring Report 6 <br />January 2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.