My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2017_3
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2017_3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 10:03:16 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:59:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2017_3
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2017_3.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
603
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
qf 7.; REPUBLIC <br /> SERVICES <br /> Mr. Brendan Kenny <br /> Engineering Geologist <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive, Suite 200 <br /> Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 <br /> January 31, 2017 <br /> RE: Forward Landfill—Fourth Quarter 2016 <br /> Dear Mr. Kenny: <br /> In accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2014-0006, Forward Incorporated (Forward) is pleased to submit <br /> this Fourth Quarter 2016/Annual Monitoring Report for the Forward Landfill. <br /> According to the Forward Landfill Operations Manager, standard observations have been conducted <br /> weekly during the reporting quarter. The Forward Landfill Operations Manager also reported that no <br /> surface water was discharged from the facility during the reporting period. During the Fourth Quarter <br /> 2016 monitoring period, no notices of violation (NOVs)were issued by the Central Valley Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board (RWQCB)or the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department. <br /> For the Forward Unit, environmental monitoring for the Fourth Quarter 2016 yielded results similar to <br /> previous quarters. A non-statistical indication of release was identified at wells MW-2A as a result of two <br /> volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured at trace concentrations; MW-16 as a result of one VOC <br /> measured at a quantifiable concentration; and at well MW-17 as a result of two VOCs measured at a <br /> quantifiable concentrations and one VOC measured at a trace concentration. However, all of the VOCs <br /> are well below maximum contaminant levels. Of note, these organic constituents have been previously <br /> confirmed and are currently in "Tracking Mode". For the inorganic monitoring parameters, concentration <br /> limits (CLs) were exceeded at wells MW-2A, MWA 0, MWA 3, MWA 5, MWA 7, MWA 8, MW-19, MW-22, <br /> and MW-24. Verification sampling for the inorganic CL exceedances is scheduled for January 2017. For <br /> constituent concentrations in "Tracking Mode" an increasing trend was calculated for diisopropyl ether at <br /> well MW-16, and carbon tetrachloride and chloroform at well MW-17. Surface water stations were <br /> reported dry during the fourth quarter 2016 monitoring period. Vadose zone monitoring stations were <br /> also reported dry or had an insufficient volume of soil-pore liquid to sample. <br /> Groundwater quality conditions beneath the Austin Unit were generally similar to historical results during <br /> the Fourth Quarter 2016 monitoring period. Excluding suspected laboratory contaminants, CL <br /> exceedances and/or non-statistical indication of release were identified at DMP wells AMW-6, AMW-12 <br /> during the fourth quarter 2016 monitoring period. It is recognized that well AMW-6 should have been <br /> identified as a CAP well in the M&RP. For the CAP/evaluation wells, 17 of 28 wells reported one or more <br /> VOCs exceeding a PQL, with CAP well AMWA having the greatest number of VOCs (12), including 11 <br /> measured above a PQL. All surface water stations and lysimeters were reported dry or there was an <br /> insufficient volume of soil-pore liquid for analysis during the fourth quarter 2016 monitoring period. Under <br /> the existing CAP, the Groundwater Treatment Facility pumped 19.4 million gallons of groundwater <br /> removing an estimated 0.85 pounds of VOCs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.