Laserfiche WebLink
Forward Landfill Hydraulic Testing <br /> Technical Memo <br /> July 03, 2019 • <br /> After completion of the pumping tests, the water level data were downloaded from the transducer data <br /> loggers for analysis. Specific capacity trends were plotted to enable assessment of drawdown against <br /> the step test pumping rates and for estimation of optimal pumping rates. The GWTS was restarted on <br /> May 3, 2019. <br /> Pre-Test Well Inspections <br /> Prior to conducting hydraulic testing each of the extraction wells were physically inspected, including well <br /> head condition,flow gauges and totalizers. The flow gauges for extraction wells EW-1 and EW-2 were <br /> found to intermittently stop under low flow conditions, but this this did not affect flow estimations at higher <br /> rates and their accuracy was tested by comparison to the flow gauge entering the groundwater treatment <br /> system, the readings were comparable at higher rates so the gauges were used for testing. <br /> EW-1 Step Test Assessment <br /> Step testing was conducted on EW-1 on May 2, 2019. The hydrograph for the step test is provided in <br /> Attachment A and field data sheets are presented in Attachment B. Manual water level readings for the <br /> pumping well and any adjacent wells are summarized in Table 2 and the step testing results are <br /> presented in Table 3 and in Figure 2. <br /> Step testing was conducted in five steps at rates of 10.0, 18.0, 35.2, 52.0 and 75.0 gallons per minute <br /> (gpm). The step tests indicated a specific capacity between 5.3 and 9.9 gallons per foot of drawdown • <br /> (gal/ft drawdown), with the final step at 9.9 gal/ft drawdown (Table 3). <br /> The drawdown at a rate of 75 gpm was 7.6 ft(62.9 ft below top of casing [btoc]), which corresponded to a <br /> pumping level of approximately 26.3 ft above the top of screen, with a drawdown of approximately 12%of <br /> the water column.A pumping rate of approximately 100 gpm could be achieved with drawdown of 9.7 ft, <br /> 16%of the water column, the water level approximately 24.2 ft above the top of screen. <br /> During the step test,the drawdown-discharge trend between steps was linear and the well and/or aquifer <br /> capacity were not stressed at the test pumping rates, with the well and aquifer able to produce more <br /> water than the current pump capacity if required. The drawdown trend during step testing of extraction <br /> well EW-1 indicates that the potential production rate for this well is in the order of 90 gpm potentially up <br /> to 140 gpm. <br /> The conveyance line capacity was increased in June 2019 and the production capacity increased to 95 <br /> gpm. If required, production rates above 95 gpm would require additional upgrades to the conveyance <br /> line and/or pump capacity and/or well rehabilitation. Review of the drillers log indicates that the entire 28 ft <br /> of screen interval are located adjacent to permeable sand rich materials. <br /> Manual water level readings collected from groundwater monitoring wells AMW-4(located approximately <br /> 390 ft from EW-1, screened shallow), AMW-6(located 16.7 ft from EW-1, screened in the deep zone) <br /> and AWM-8(located 31.5 ft from EW-1 and screened in the intermediate zone)all displayed a drawdown <br /> response to pumping EW-1, therefore indicating a degree of hydraulic connection to the pumping well. <br /> The pumping duration was relatively short and groundwater drawdown equilibrium was not reached, so a <br /> hydraulic connection is all that can be concluded. <br /> • <br /> arcadis corn <br /> FL Specific Capacity Test Memo 07032019.docx <br /> Page: <br /> 2/7 <br />