Laserfiche WebLink
Forward Landfill Hydraulic Testing <br /> Technical Memo <br /> • July 03, 2019 <br /> The optimal pumping rate was used for the well capture assessment for each of the wells, with results <br /> presented in Table 6. The results indicate that the POC does not have full groundwater capture and that <br /> some gaps in capture exist along the POC, however, the eastern portion of the POC is complicated by <br /> localized groundwater mounding created by the GWTS infiltration system which alters groundwater flow <br /> locally and likely creates a groundwater gradient towards the site in this area. The capture estimates <br /> presented are conservative as the hydraulic gradient is likely less than that used for the capture <br /> calculations and actual groundwater capture is likely greater in the eastern portion of the POC. <br /> GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENTS <br /> Groundwater sampling of extraction wells EW-1, EW-2 and EW-4 were conducted on February 27 and <br /> 28, 2019 during the step test towards the start(near the end of Step-1)and end(near the end of Step-2) <br /> of pumping. The samples were placed on ice and submitted to BC Laboratories Inc. in Bakersfield, <br /> California for analysis of volatile organic compounds(VOCs) by United States Environmental Protection <br /> Agency(EPA) Method 8260B. Field parameters were collected with a Hanna multimeter. The water <br /> quality parameters for pH, temperature, and electrical conductivity were similar during the pumping tests <br /> for extraction wells EW-1 and EW-4(eastern side of the POC), however for EW-4(western side POC) <br /> over the course of the step test the electrical conductivity increased (485 to 608 micro siemens per <br /> centimeter[NS/cm])and pH decreased (7.18 to 6.95) pumping period(end of step 1 to end of step 5). <br /> Two VOC samples per well were collected during the step pumping tests. A summary of the detected <br /> . VOCs is presented in Table 7. VOCs were not detected in extraction wells EW-1 or EW-4 located on the <br /> eastern portion of the POC. Five VOCs were detected in extraction well EW-2 and seven VOCs were <br /> detected in extraction well EW-3R(tested in February)on the western portion of the POC; none were <br /> detected above MCL concentrations. <br /> DEVIATIONS TO WORKPLAN <br /> The following were deviations to the workplan: <br /> A pressure transducer could not be deployed to groundwater extraction well EW-4, due to the <br /> orifice hole being too narrow. In this case, only manual water level readings were collected from <br /> the pumping well. <br /> INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE <br /> Groundwater generated as part of the hydraulic testing activities was routed directly into the on-site <br /> GWTS infrastructure. <br /> SUMMARY <br /> Hydraulic step testing of extraction wells EW-1, EW-2 and EW-4 was performed to assess the respective <br /> well capacities, optimize the well extraction rates and assess groundwater capture at the POC. <br /> Hydraulic step testing conducted on extraction well EW-1 was pumped up to an extraction rate of 75 gpm <br /> which did not stress the well or aquifer capacities and indicated pumping rates of 90-140 gpm could be <br /> arcadis com <br /> FL Specific Capacity Test Memo 07032019.docx <br /> Page: <br /> 5/7 <br />