My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
17720
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440058
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 2:16:11 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:00:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1981
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440058_17720 E HARNEY_1981.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The project has no potential to alter the geologic integrity of the study <br />area or create significant geologic hazards on-site. No mitigation of geologic <br />impacts is deemed necessary. <br />Seismicity - <br />The Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration map published by the California <br />Division of Mines and Geology C.D.M. FG—.) shows the study area to be within <br />an area with a predicted seismic acceleration range of 0.2 g or less which <br />is the lowest rating in the State. The Earthquake Epicenter Map of Califor- <br />nia, also by the C.D.M. &G., indicates that no earthquake epicenters of <br />Richter magnitude four or greater have been mapped in San Joaquin County <br />between 1900 and 1978. <br />The closest fault shown on the Fault Map of California, (C.D.M. & G.), <br />is the Stockton Fault, approximately six miles to the south. Based on the <br />evidence presented, it appears that the site could reasonably be considered <br />to be among the quietest seismic areas within the State of California. <br />Due to the nature of the project, there would be no possibility for <br />significantly altering the seismic hazard potential of the study area. <br />Climate <br />San Joaquin County enjoys a climate commonly referred to as a Mediter- <br />ranean type with cool, moist winters and hot, dry summers. The project site <br />is located slightly south of the zone of divergence of incoming marine air. <br />During the summer, air from the coast enters the Valley by way of the San <br />Francisco Bay gap and Carquinez Strait, then undergoes rapid modification of <br />temperature and relative humidity (see Figure 3). Part of the airflow turns <br />northward into the Sacramento Valley and part turns southward into the San <br />Joaquin Valley. During late fall and winter, cold air frequently drains off <br />the mountain slopes into the two valleys. This results in airflow toward the <br />north in the San Joaquin Valley and southward in the Sacramento Valley, creat- <br />ing a zone of wind convergence that fluctuates north and south of the delta <br />region according to the relative strength of the airflow out of each valley. <br />The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation report by J. H. Kleinfelder <br />and Associates states that the site experience means annual precipitation <br />ranging between 14 and 16 inches per year. This information was confirmed by <br />the U.S.G.S. isohyetal map for the region and is based on data collected over <br />a period greater than 60 years. <br />The climate and meteorology of the San Joaquin Valley are unusually <br />conducive for the accumulation of air pollutants. With a high number of sun- <br />shine hours, seasonal inversion conditions, and frequent absence of wind, the <br />Valley has a greater potential for high levels of air pollution then either <br />the Los Angeles or San Francisco Basins. <br />Since the project has no potential to significantly alter the local <br />microclimate or the regional macroclimate just described, no mitigation <br />is deemed necessary. <br />4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.