Laserfiche WebLink
with refuse as the landfill operation proceeds. <br />When considered by itself, the lost of approximately 290 to 300 acres <br />of topsoil may not be significant on a county or state-wide basis. However, <br />it would contribute to the cumulative loss of potentially arable land in <br />California. To illustrate this trend, of the 100.2 million acres of land <br />in California, 39.0 million acres of land were in agricultural use in 1960. <br />This has been reduced to 33.5 million acres by 1980, an average of 275,000 <br />acres less per year. Obviously, this cannot continue indefinately without <br />seriously reducing our food producing capability. <br />Another matter for consideration relative to soil impacts is erosion. <br />Left in its natural state, soils on-site are not particularly prone to <br />erosion because they are stabilized by the root systems and above ground <br />portions of established vegetation. However, if this vegetation is removed <br />and the compacted earth is loosened by earthwork, erosion and subsequent <br />siltation of receiving waters could become a significant problem. The rate <br />of erosion for denuded and disturbed soils can be many times that of natural, <br />stabilized soils. In the soils section it has been identified that erosion <br />is the dominant limitation of soils on-site. <br />Erosion is caused by rainfall and runoff as the kinetic energy of falling <br />rain drops displaces soil particles. Rain falling on denuded areas runs <br />off, carrying suspended soil particles downslope and into minor stream <br />channels. As the volume and velocity of runoff increases, deposited particles <br />are scoured from the channels and transported farther downstream. Deposition <br />�,,iill occur again when the runoff slows down such as when channel slope <br />decreases or when barriers or dams are encountered. However, there are many <br />erosion control methods which could be employed to mitigate this impact. <br />The mitigation section discusses possible measures. <br />Virtually all soil impacts discussed in this section would be character- <br />istic of most sites for a landfill, perhaps worse in other locations. Loss <br />of potential arable land, increased erosion and loss of topsoil are inherent <br />impacts of this method of solid waste disposal. <br />Hydrologic Conditions/Water Quality <br />Surface Water <br />Surface water runoff patterns would be slightly modified from its present <br />condition. Sheet runoff which flows to the north and northwest would instead <br />be diverted by temporary and permanent diversion structures to a branch of <br />South Paddy Creek. An increase in runoff contributed to the creek by this <br />modification should be anticipated. <br />Only during periods of unusually heavy participation would there be <br />any noticeable impact on the quality of the surface runoff. During periods <br />of heavy precipitation, both the excavated and filled areas would be subject <br />