ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

V, . Site Location Parcel No. 1, E1/2 of Section 21, T3N, R8E Parcel No. 2, Section 17, T3N, R9E Parcel No. 3, W1/2 of Section 22, T3N, R8E roposed Site) Parcel No. 4, SE1/4 of Section 17, T3N, R8E arcel No. 5, W1/2 of con , �i3N, R8E -ci Advantage Disadvantage Available for Potential utility purchase problem On-site residences No drainage 4-1/2 miles further east - problems of other proposed sites. No utility Harney Lane would need -problems improvement. Poses less public opposition Available for purchase Potential utility problem' On-site residence Unavailable for purchase Available for Drainage problems purchase Utility easements reduce fillable area 50 percent No utility Potential drainage problem problems Unavailable for purchase Adjacent Residences Further evaluations were made and Parcel No. 2 was selected but was rejected by the County Board of Supervisors. Following that action, additional geotechnical work was performed and Parcel No. 5, the proposed site, was selected as the next most promising site. Based on the memorandum, comments, the pro- posed site appears to be the site perferred by the County Department of Public Works Although recovery and reuse of secondary materials and energy was also discussed in the County Plan, this alternative was not specifically evaluated relative to the other alternatives. Consequently, this alternative is now presented in Appendix D. Another possible alternative, which was not discussed in the Solid Waste Management Plan, is to make use of the Sanitary City Disposal, Inc.'s future transfer station in Lodi and rehaul to the existing or replacement Harney Lane site. The transfer station is scheduled for operation by April 1981. The cost of this alternative would be less than Alternatives B, C and D, but it would be slightly more than the proposed project. This is because the direct haul dis- tance to the proposed site is not far enough (less than six miles east of existing &I0