ARCHIVED REPORTS_1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

:' ari;cy L—anc .`;anitar y .� Larcifill Sites - 2-- I y ) 157 w .? • � .r This r. ita appears to be levy cut up by -"M all dr4in4 e c*-ar.r;e ; than ParCel '-:o. 5. There are: houses on this prcre:rt� a v Y. that CCU' -..d be,: U, - fGl` GPcrat�:;u personnel if it was desirable. :iC ciCpLh to :Ii:tCr �•:e11s� at ti;is site is approximatel` -�' ,� 120 feet. This snould not cause too much of a proble.;i in developing a well for the' site, e T,_s' parcel is actually for sale and, therefore, it _%•could prcc'rib be easier _o negotiate with the owner. �+. Parcel vTo.• 3 W.1/2 Sec, 22, T. 3 N., ,R. 8 E. + This parcel contains approximate Y. dr ti -y 32a . acres. . The rainage prcc��.:;,. on this parcel should be less than' -on Par cel No. 5 or Parcel :,To, 1 s_ cCvei the drainage area is only 245 acres with'a 100 -year Q of ap ;roxi-aVe1;� 9C. cub4-c felt per second. The P.G.& E, high tension tower line, is;•:eve 14`U is more nearly in the middle of the parcel, The remarks co cernin-� restrictions along the P<G.& tower line outlined under ?arcd1.:•:o, . also apply to this parcel. The house on the property is ;.cr2 Mea: _y �r, »a the ,,piddle of the lone; side of the parcel. 'Having both theP.0 & _ _ ` tc,.er line and the house nearer' the middle -n ; the property.coulez r:i::` o_ e diff icult .to'•provide as much area for .Salid V,'aste Disposal could be provided in the case of Parcel No. 1. The depth to i•tacc. 'e wells'at this site is approximately 1.20. feet which should require a_:._:,:;, }1 Mately the sane .cost as developing a well for Parcel No. 1. r1'nis parcel is not make it more difficult Parcel No. 1. actually on the market, for sa_e 1.1,, e:1 could to negotiate a sale than negotiating a sale fc:' 5... Parcel No. 2 Sec. 17, T. 3 N.; R..9 E, _. This parcel contains approximately 640 acres.' The w;zstern ^alf . of this section appears to' be rd-latively free of''drainage proDle" exca for some minor drainages that could be channelized near the boundary or interior drainage that could -be leveled out. The northeast 1/4 sacti� rices have a. larger -drainage channel which:has'a drainage area of 3600 acres with a 100 -year Q of 1200 cubic feet per second. This drainage could be channelized'a,long the boundary to facilitate develooment, but the ground is fairly steep and' with that amount of...runof f it would . be quite expensive. -However; the west 320 acres and the S.E. 1/4 section could be developed w-ithout excessive drainage cost. Thera are no 'e Utilities across. this •site to interfere with the development. 3 Them ajor disadvantage to this site is that it is 'four anc.ona half miles further east than the center of. the other three sites. •'-his "Would mean a nine mile longer round' trip to the site. The other -dis- advantage is that Harney Lane east of. Clements Road would 'nave to be . rebuilt for -a little over three miles to the site. At t';e craser.t tine one mile of this road the pavement is in very poor conditic:a a::c riles are only graveled. In addition several culverts would lav` zo be constructed under the new -road' at swales. The width bet;:ben existin; fences is 35 feet in places which May be narrow for rebuthe ild_r— t^e road. Also there may be no rights of way acquired for - last rile of this road, •The depth to water in wells at this location is .pprcxi- matcly 2.30 feet po it would also be more expensive to develop a.i..ell on the site, 12 0s