My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
17720
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440058
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:36 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:02:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2010_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440058_17720 E HARNEY_2010_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
used was a 25-channel Texas Instruments Model Photographic <br /> Recording Oscillograph . <br /> The energy source used consisted of a 33-pound sledge hammer <br /> equipped with seismograph /oscillograph drive switch and <br /> piezoelectric trigger mechanism ( time break ) . <br /> Limitations <br /> The subsurface velocity profiles presented in this report <br /> represent the most reasonable interpretation of seismic <br /> refraction survey data based on our knowledge of the existing <br /> geologic conditions at the site . The results are presented for <br /> design feasibility information only and are not intended to serve <br /> as information for determining construction procedures . <br /> Interpretations were made in accordance with generally accepted <br /> geophysical methods and practices . This warranty - is in lieu of <br /> all other warranties , express. or implied . <br /> The quality of seismic refraction data for this survey was <br /> good ; but . in cases was affected by electrical disturbance from a <br /> nearby power transmission lines Cheavy 60 Hz noise ) , and In some <br /> cases was affected by background noise from passing vehicles and <br /> aircraft , slightly irregular terrain , wind , and lateral <br /> inhomogeneity ( scattered resistant blocks ) . These factors <br /> produced noise signals and /or scatter in the recorded data , <br /> I .imiting the accuracy of first break compression wave picks and <br /> interpretation . <br /> The seismic refraction method used has some inherent <br /> limitations such as the possibility for undetectable hidden <br /> layers , blind zones , and velocity inversions . The absence of <br /> exploratory borings and other existing subsurface geologic <br /> information in the area surveyed may also limit the reliability <br /> of interpretation , since more than one interpretation is often <br /> possible for a given set of data , and correlation with borings or <br /> other subsurface information is important in 'establishing <br /> accuracy . <br /> The maximum depth of reliable seismic information obtained <br /> during this survey can be assumed to be approximately one- third <br /> of the length of the individual lines , with information at a <br /> maximum depth underlying the middle one- third of the lines . For <br /> example , a seismic refraction line 300 feet in length will <br /> typically yield reliable data on subsurface materials to a depth <br /> of about 100 feet beneath the middle 100 feet of the line . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.