Laserfiche WebLink
1. H. KLEINFELQER & ASSOCIATES <br />File: W-2022-1/11:312 <br />June 19, 1986 <br />Page 12 <br />Based on our field explorations and previous research, we <br />estimate ground water to be at approximately 200 to 300 feet <br />below ground surface at the landfill site. Historically, seepage <br />from the near -surface gravels of the Corral Hollow drainage <br />located south of the current landfill operations, has not been <br />observed. Therefore, although ground water has been measured at <br />a shallow depth approximately one mile west of the site, the <br />general ground water conditions directly beneath the existing <br />landfill do not appear effected by this limited near -surface <br />ground water source. <br />FINDINGS <br />Rising water levels encountered while <br />drilling and geologic <br />-- profiles containing apparently extensive continuous impermeable <br />strata appear to indicate confined, or at least semi -confined <br />aquifer conditions. Local and laterally limited near surface <br />perched zones of unconfined water bearing zones may exist near <br />the site, but were not observed in our borings at the Corral <br />Hollow Landfill. <br />It appears that the regional aquifer in the area is overlain <br />by a confining layer. If wells are drilled through this <br />confining layer, water from the aquifer may rise considerable <br />distances above the top of the aquifer. It appears that the <br />potentiometric surface for this aquifer is considerably higher <br />than the elevation of first encountered ground water. Based on <br />our analyses of the referenced report and with the low natural <br />permeability of soils beneath the site, it appears that breaching <br />the impermeable zone would allow the water surface to rise and <br />could potentially promote contamination of the aquifer. <br />This report was prepared in general accordance with the <br />accepted standard of care which exists in Northern California at <br />the time the investigation was performed. Statements made in <br />this report are based on the results of our firm's review of <br />previous available reports, published information, and our <br />understanding of the project. The geologic data used in this <br />report was obtained from previous field investigations, existing <br />laboratory test results, and drill logs available in the vicinity <br />of the site. <br />It should be recognized that definition and evaluation of <br />geologic conditions is a difficult and inexact art. Judgements <br />leading to conclusions and recommendations are generally made <br />with an incomplete knowledge of the subsurface conditions <br />present. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. <br />