My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:04:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440003_31130 CORRAL HOLLOW_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Tricolored blackbirds nest in dense wetland vegetation and blackberry thickets and forage in grasslands <br />and agricultural fields as far as 4 miles from a nesting colony (Beedy et al. 1991). <br />Tricolored blackbirds have declined throughout their range due to loss of wetland breeding habitat, nest <br />disturbance, aerial spraying of pesticides and herbicides, and mortality from poisoned grain (Terres 1987, <br />Beedy et al. 1991). <br />Status in the Project Area. Tricolored blackbirds were not observed during field surveys, nor is there <br />suitable nesting habitat at the project site. In 1993, tricolored blackbirds nested approximately 10 miles <br />east of the project site on Durham Ferry Road (Yee pens. comm.). Tricolored blackbirds could <br />occasionally forage at the project site in winter but are not expected to occur during the breeding season <br />because of the lack of breeding habitat within suitable foraging distance of the project site. <br />Mountain Plover <br />Background. A major portion of the wintering population of mountain plovers is found in the Central <br />Valley (Leachman pers. comm.). The plover occurs regularly along the west side of the Central Valley <br />from Yolo and Colusa Counties southward and in the foothills west of the San Joaquin Valley (McCaskie <br />et al. 1979). <br />The plover forages and roosts in plains of short grass and low, rolling hills with sparse herbaceous <br />vegetation; freshly disked agricultural fields; and sprouting grainfields (Grinnell and Miller 1944, Leachman <br />pers. comm.). <br />The number and size of plover flocks has declined in recent decades (Leachman pers. comm.). Several <br />factors have contributed to the decline of mountain plover populations, including the loss of breeding and <br />wintering grassland habitat converted to agricultural fields and residential and commercial developments <br />(Leachman pers. comm.). <br />Status in the Project Area and Vicinity. Mountain plovers were not observed during Jones & Stokes <br />Associates' February field survey. There are no known wintering use areas in San Joaquin County; <br />however, many wintering plovers are frequently observed near Clifton Court Forebay approximately 10 <br />miles northwest of the project site (Yee pers. comm.). Mountain plovers could be expected to occur <br />infrequently and in small numbers in annual grasslands at the project site. <br />IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br />Criteria for Determining Significance <br />Botanical and wildlife impacts were considered less than significant if: <br />species are widespread locally and statewide; <br />special -status species are unlikely to be present; or <br />habitats are dominated by introduced species, do not support other significant attributes, and <br />have low habitat value to wildlife. <br />Impacts were considered significant if they cause: <br />adverse effects on substantial areas of significant natural communities, such as wetlands or vernal <br />pools; <br />• direct mortality, temporary or permanent habitat loss, or lowered reproductive success for <br />individuals of plant or wildlife species that are state or federally listed or proposed for listing; or <br />ER -93-1 41 - (9-27-93) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.