My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:04:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440003_31130 CORRAL HOLLOW_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />The proposed new fill slopes are flatter than 2:1. Most of the existing cut and fill slopes in the <br />reclaimed quarry are also flatter than 2:1. The exception is in the northwest corner of the former <br />pit, where slopes as steep as about 1.5:1 are present. The current site development plan <br />indicates that wood storage and composting (both currently proposed and future) is planned in <br />the area where slopes steeper than 2:1 occur. <br />Mitigation <br />4.4-2 Proper construction practices, according to the geotechnical engineer's recommendations (RGH, <br />1993), shall be followed for all new cuts and fills. It must be demonstrated that any reclaimed <br />fills in areas near the proposed facilities were constructed according to RGH recommendations, <br />or at least demonstrated that soils properties of these fills are in accordance with those assumed <br />during the slope stability analyses. <br />In areas where slopes are steeper than 2:1, or where old fill soils properties are questionable, <br />mitigation shall be performed. Mitigation options include: <br />• Regrade slopes to 2:1 or flatter; <br />• Set back all improvements at least 30 feet from the top and bottom of the slopes; and/or <br />• Erect landslide debris barriers. <br />The impact after mitigation is considered to be less -than -significant. <br />Impact <br />4.4-3 Existing surface soils are Inadequate to support foundations for the proposed project <br />facilities. <br />Weak, porous surface soils were described in the geotechnical report (RGH, 1993). These soils <br />are considered inadequate to support the loads of fills, foundations, slabs and pavement when <br />their moisture content approaches saturation. <br />Mitigation <br />4.4-3 Construction of fills, foundations, slabs and roadways shall be in accordance with RGH (1993) <br />recommendations. The impact after mitigation is considered to be less -than -significant. <br />Im .� <br />4.4-4 Construction of the proposed project facilities would restrict the recovery of valuable mineral <br />resources. <br />The project site has previously been mined of its valuable gravel resources. No gravel resources <br />remain. The proposed TMRTF will have no impact on the gravel operations which occur to the <br />west and north of the project area. <br />Mitigation <br />4.4-4 No mitigation is required or recommended. <br />ER -93-1 <br />4 <br />IK. -?Z <br />(9-27-93) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.