Laserfiche WebLink
concentration at the perimeter (soil gas) wells falls below the regulatory limit of 5 percent, to zero if <br />possible. However, excess withdrawal, as indicated by the reduction of methane content in an individual <br />LFG well to below 35 percent, indicates the potential for a subsurface landfill fire. Note that LFG is <br />approximately 55 percent methane at the point of production within the landfill. Methane content below <br />this value indicates dilution by air drawn through the soil into the refuse by the negative pressure at the <br />well. Maximizing LFG collection while minimizing air intrusion is a "balancing act" which requires <br />continual adjustment of the operation of the LFG system. <br />RESULTS <br />� <br />Corrective action is successful, indicated by the lack of continued increase in VOC concentration and by <br />reduction in combustible gas in the soil gas wells since the installation of the LFG collection system in <br />2001. <br />Groundwater <br />VOCs <br />Concentration of these compound appear to be stable. <br />In October 2000, ten VOCs were detected above the PQL at well MW -5 immediately before the LFG <br />system became operational. This quarter, four VOCs are reported above the PQL at MW -5, with two other <br />compounds reported as trace concentrations (Table 1 Appendix E). No VOC was above the Maximum • <br />Contaminant Levels (MCLs). <br />Low concentrations of vinyl chloride, which is a degradation product of cis-1,2-dichloroethene, <br />Trichloroethene, and Tetrachloroethene, is evidence of the biodegradation of VOCs in the groundwater at <br />well MW -5. <br />Three VOCs were reported above the PQL in MW -8 this quarter, similar to previous quarters, none above <br />6.3 ppb (Table 1). These VOCs are consistent with those found in MW -5, but are fewer in number and <br />generally at lower concentrations. The direction of this concentration gradient indicates that the VOCs in <br />both MW -5 and MW -8 emanate from a small area, possibly the refuse found closer to MW -5, rather than <br />from the landfill as a whole. This significant finding allows us to focus on increasing LFG collection in <br />that area. <br />The County continues to apply vacuum to these wells such that the concentration of methane at these well <br />is significantly reduced, and hopes that results will continue to be positive. <br />Inorganic Compounds <br />Sanitas continues to report decreasing trends in Chlorides, Sulfate, and total dissolved solids at MW -4 <br />continuing this quarter, with no increasing trends. The County interprets this as the positive effects of <br />improving grading and preventing ponding along the eastern drainage ditch in late 2003. <br />Corral Hollow Landfill Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br />3rd Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin — October 30, 2012 <br />