Laserfiche WebLink
southwest, which is an opposite direction to the flow in the deep aquifer. The sediments below the <br />Corcoran Formation are dry until the deep aquifer is encountered at depths of over 300 feet. <br />Compliance History Summary <br />iGroundwater monitoring is in accordance with WDRs issued in 1989, 1994 and 2001. These <br />WDRs require monitoring the shallow and deep aquifer on the east and west sides of the landfill, <br />and monitoring the shallow aquifer on the east side of the landfill. The shallow aquifer is not <br />tpresent west of the landfill, and therefore cannot be monitored at that location. <br />In 1990, deep aquifer wells MW -1, MW -2, and MW -3 went dry due to falling water levels. <br />In the fourth quarter of 1991, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Trichlorofluoromethane <br />[Freon 11] and Tetrachloroethene [PCE]) were first detected in groundwater samples collected <br />from MW -5 (shallow aquifer), and were confirmed in February 1992. The County believes that <br />the presence of VOCs in MW -5 was due to landfill gas (LFG) influence. <br />In 1995, a corrective action plan (CAP) was implemented which included the closure and final <br />cover construction for the landfill. <br />In 1996, closure was complete, including the installation of landfill gas (LFG) migration <br />monitoring wells. Monitoring of these wells indicated combustible gas above the regulatory limit <br />of 5%. <br />In 2001, a LFG collection system was installed as a corrective action (source removal) against <br />VOC impacts and to prevent offsite migration of LFG. Effectiveness of the LFG system is <br />indicated by the absence of landfill gas at the perimeter monitoring wells and prevention of further <br />VOC impacts indicated by a reduction of the number of individual constituent VOC detections <br />(Appendix E, Tabular Summary of Historical Monitoring Data). This system is presently <br />extracting as much LFG as possible, as indicated by the low methane concentration of the gas <br />reaching the LFG flare station. <br />The WDRs of 2001 required the installation of additional deep -aquifer monitoring wells because <br />the deep aquifer level had lowered such that the original deep aquifer wells (MW -1, -2, and -3) no <br />longer reached that aquifer. <br />In 2003 deep -aquifer monitoring wells MW -6 and MW -7 were installed. Knowledge of the <br />direction of the flow in this aquifer by monitoring the three previous deep -aquifer wells allowed <br />these wells to be located directly up gradient and down gradient of the landfill. <br />In 2003, an investigation of off-site contamination and the effect on water quality parameters in <br />MW -4 was initiated due to a slight increase in the concentration of Nitrate as Nitrogen and a <br />decreasing trend in pH. This investigation was inconclusive. <br />In late 2003 the drainage ditch adjacent to the eastern access road was improved to reduce ponding <br />and minimize infiltration along the ditch. <br />I <br />Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill 4 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br />3"' Quarter 2013 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin — October 15, 2013 <br />