Laserfiche WebLink
4.5 LEACHATE MONITORING <br /> The laboratory results for leachate monitoring well MW-2 are summarized in Table 3 and <br /> time-series concentration plots are presented in Appendix D. As shown on Table 3, no <br /> VOCs were detected in the sample collected from leachate monitoring well MW-2 during <br /> the monitoring period. <br /> 4.6 SURFACE-WATER MONITORING <br /> Field and laboratory results for surface-water monitoring stations (SW-1, SW-2, and <br /> SW-3) for the current monitoring period are summarized in Table 4. Locations SW-1 <br /> and SW-2 are located upstream of the landfill within the Walker and French Camp <br /> Sloughs, respectively, and are used as background sampling points, while SW-3 is <br /> located downstream of the landfill at the confluence of the two sloughs. During the <br /> monitoring period, trace level concentrations of toluene were detected in all three surface <br /> water stations. It should be noted, however,that toluene is a common field/laboratory <br /> contaminant. <br /> Water quality data from surface-water sampling stations were graphed on time-series <br /> concentration plots and are presented in Appendix D. For the surface water monitoring <br /> stations at the French Camp Landfill, CLs are used for the WQPS. The CLs shown in <br /> Table 4 were calculated by Herst& Associates using Sanitaso, a state-approved statistical <br /> software program using historical data from background surface water stations SW-1 and <br /> SW-2, and are presented in Appendix D. As shown in Table 4, with the exception of <br /> turbidity, no CLs were exceeded at surface water stations during the monitoring period. <br /> As has been the case historically, statistically significant increasing trends for turbidity <br /> were calculated at surface water stations SW-1, SW-2, and SW-3 (Appendix D). Since <br /> turbidity exhibits a statistically significant increasing trend at background surface water <br /> stations SW-1 and SW-2, the increasing trend in turbidity at SW-3 is unlikely to be <br /> indicative of an impact from the landfill. <br /> Stream gauging was performed on Mach 16, and May 22, 2010 at monitoring points <br /> SG-1 and SG-2 and the data are summarized in Table 5. As shown in Figure 1, <br /> monitoring point SG-1 is located upgradient in the Walker Slough and monitoring point <br /> SG-2 is located upgradient in the French Camp Slough. <br /> 5.0 SOIL-PORE GAS MONITORING <br /> In accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2007-0046, soil-pore gas probes are monitored <br /> semiannually using a field screening protocol, and soil-pore gas samples are only <br /> collected if field screening indicates methane concentrations greater than 2.5 percent. <br /> During the monitoring period, field screening of soil-pore gas probes was conducted on <br /> D:\2010-0030\FC_1 SAI0.doc <br /> 5 Geologic Associates <br />