Laserfiche WebLink
FORWARD <br /> LANDFILL 9999 S.Austin Road <br /> Manteca,SCA 95336 <br /> (209)9824298,Fax(209)982-1009 <br /> July 26,2010 <br /> JN:2009-0018 <br /> Mr. Ross Atkinson <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive,#200 <br /> Rancho Cordova,CA 95670-6114 <br /> SUBJECT: JANUARY—JUNE 2010 FIRST SEMIANNUAL <br /> WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT <br /> FRENCH CAMP LANDFILL <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY,CALIFORNIA- <br /> Forward,Inc.(Forward).is pleased to submit the January through June 2010 semiannual <br /> monitoring report for the French Camp Landfill,in compliance with the California Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board-Central Valley Region(RWQCB)Waste Discharge Requirement <br /> (WDR)Order Number R5-2007-0046. <br /> This report summarizes standard observations and presents the results of surface-water, <br /> groundwater, and soil-pore gas monitoring from the serniamntal(January 1 through June 30, <br /> 2010)(monitoring period). A summary of analytical results and time-series concentration plots <br /> for field and monitoring parameters are also included in this report. A description of field <br /> procedures and sampling protocols followed by personnel conducting field monitoring activities <br /> is included in Appendix B of the report. <br /> Groundwater quality conditions beneath the French Camp Landfill during the monitoring period <br /> are generally similar to those observed in previous monitoring periods. Concentration limits <br /> (CLs)were exceeded for a constituent in the samples collected from background well MW-6A, <br /> and compliance wells MW-9A and MW-9B. It should be noted,however,that none of the <br /> constituents that exceeded a CL exhibited a statistically significant increasing trend during the <br /> monitoring period. Organic constituent results indicate chloroform was measured above the <br /> practical quantitation limit in the sample collected from wells MW-6A. However, a similar <br /> concentration of chloroform was also detected in the QA/QC field blank. The presence of <br /> chloroform in well MW-6A is not believed to the result of a release from the landfill since <br /> chloroform has been rarely detected in on-site wells and background well MW-6A is located <br /> approximately 1200 feet cross-gradient from the landfill. <br /> The results of water quality analyses completed for surface-water monitoring stations are <br /> generally consistent with previous results. During the monitoring period,trace level <br /> concentrations of toluene were detected in all three surface water stations. It should be noted, <br /> however, that toluene is a common field/laboratory contaminant. With the exception of turbidity <br /> in all three surface-water samples,no statistically significant increasing trends were noted. Since <br />