Laserfiche WebLink
the CDCs included for the French Camp Landfill and Tables 2 through 4 summarize the <br /> results. Excluding the metals, which may be naturally occurring,no COCl were detected <br /> in samples collected from the French Camp Landfill during the monitoring period. <br /> As shown on Tables 2 through 4, the following metal analytes exceeded state or federal <br /> maximum contaminant levels (MCLs); arsenic in well MW-6A; iron in wells MW-7A, <br /> MW-913, MW-10A; and manganese in wells MW-2,MW-7A, MW-8A, MW-913, and <br /> MW-I OA. For surface water, the following metal analytes exceeded state or federal <br /> MCLS; iron at stations S -1, SW-2, and SW-3; and manganese at station SW-1. Given <br /> the fact that elevated arsenic, iron, and manganese concentrations were measured in <br /> background wells and upgradient surface water stations, the MCL exceedances do not <br /> appear to be related to a release from the landfill. <br /> 5.0 SOIL-PORE GAS MONITORING <br /> In accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2007-0046, soil-pore gas probes are monitored <br /> semiannually using a field screening protocol, and soil-pore gas samples are only <br /> collected if field screening indicates methane concentrations greater than 2.5 percent. <br /> During the monitoring period, field screening of soil-pore gas probes was conducted on <br /> August 18, 2009. As shown on Table 6,no methane was detected in any of the soil-pore <br /> gas probes, and as a result, no samples were collected. <br /> 6.0 ANNUAL SUMMARY <br /> 6.1 GENERAL <br /> During the 2009 monitoring year, groundwater elevation measurements were performed <br /> quarterly and water quality monitoring points and soil-pore gas probes were sampled <br /> semiannually in accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2007-0046. All of the monitoring <br /> points are sampled for the monitoring parameters summarized in Table 1. Time-series <br /> plots depicting groundwater and surface water constituent concentrations and a tabular <br /> summary of the historical monitoring are presented in Appendix D and an electronic <br /> format is included in Appendix C. Piper diagrams of the semiannual data obtained in <br /> 2009 are included in Appendix D, and hydrographs of the detection monitoring wells, <br /> illustrating historic groundwater elevations,well screen elevations, and pump intake <br /> elevations are also included in Appendix D. Discussions of the historical trends in <br /> constituent concentrations are presented in Section 4. <br /> 6.2 GROUNDWATER <br /> Groundwater elevations have remained relatively static over the past year,reflecting <br /> seasonal precipitation patterns. Groundwater generally flows to the south across the site <br /> at a gradient of 0.002 to 0.003 ft/ft. <br /> D:\200&0012\FC_2SA09.doc 6 Geologic Associates <br />