Laserfiche WebLink
FORWARD <br /> LANDFILL 9999 S. Austin Road <br /> Manteca,CA 95336 <br /> (209)9824298,Fax(209)982-1009 <br /> July 26, 2011 <br /> JN: 2011-0051 <br /> Mr. Ross Atkinson <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive, #200 <br /> Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114 <br /> SUBJECT: JANUARY—JUNE 2011 FIRST SEMIANNUAL <br /> WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT <br /> FRENCH CAMP LANDFILL <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> Forward, Inc. (Forward) is pleased to submit the January through June 2011 semiannual <br /> monitoring report for the French Camp Landfill, in compliance with the California Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board - Central Valley Region(RWQCB) Waste Discharge Requirement <br /> (WDR) Order Number R5-2007-0046. <br /> This report summarizes standard observations and presents the results of surface-water, <br /> groundwater, and soil-pore gas monitoring from the semiannual (January 1 through June 30, <br /> 2011)monitoring period. Groundwater quality conditions beneath the French Camp Landfill <br /> during the monitoring period are generally similar to those observed in previous monitoring <br /> periods. A concentration limit(CL) was exceeded for one constituent in the samples collected <br /> from background well MW-6A, and compliance wells MW-913 and MW-10A. It should be <br /> noted, however, that none of the constituents that exceeded a CL exhibited a statistically <br /> significant increasing trend during the monitoring period. During the monitoring period, no <br /> volatile organic compounds (VOCs)were detected in any of the groundwater monitoring wells, <br /> and there is no indication of a release from the facility. In addition,no notices of violation or <br /> areas of concern were observed during the monitoring period. <br /> The results of water quality analyses completed for surface-water monitoring stations are <br /> generally consistent with previous results. During the monitoring period, no VOCs were <br /> detected in any of the surface water stations, and potassium was the only surface water <br /> constituent that exceeded a CL. It is believed that the CL exceedance for potassium at <br /> downstream location SW-3 may be due to a recent change in natural surface water chemistry in <br /> the vicinity of the site. With the exception of turbidity at all three surface-water samples and <br /> carbonate alkalinity at surface water stations SW-1 and SW-3, no statistically significant <br /> increasing trends were noted. Since turbidity and carbonate alkalinity exhibit statistically <br /> significant increasing trends in both upstream and downstream surface water stations, these <br /> increasing trends are unlikely to be indicative of an impact from the facility. <br />