ARCHIVED REPORTS_2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

noted(see signed "Certification Statement" located inside cover page, after the Table Of Contents in this report). 3.0 SOLID WASTENIT The French Camp Landfill has been formally closed and no longer receives waste (Appendix A). 4.0 WATERQUALITY NIT .1 SAMPLING AND LABORATORY ANALYSES All of the groundwater and leachate monitoring wells and surface water monitoring points were sampled on August 30 and 31, 2011. Quarterly depth-to-water and stream gauging was performed on August 30 and 31, and November 7, 2011. A single sample set was collected from each sampling point(groundwater, leachate, and surface water) and analyzed by BC Laboratories for the parameters stipulated in RWQCB Order No. R5-2007-0046, as summarized in Table 1. Water quality samples were also analyzed in the field for oxidation-reduction potential,turbidity, temperature, specific conductance, and pH and these field measurements were recorded on well data sheets. The groundwater and leachate monitoring wells and surface water monitoring points were sampled by Del-Tech Geotechnical Support Services(Del-Tech) in accordance with the sampling and analysis procedures detailed in Appendix B. Well data sheets, raw laboratory data, certificates of analyses, and chain-of-custody records for the sampling program are included in Appendix C. The laboratory analyses and field results for groundwater wells and surface water sampling stations are summarized in Tables 2 through 5. 4.2 A/ C RESULTS The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)program completed for the monitoring event included analyses of one duplicate sample, one field(ambient) blank, one trip blank, and two laboratory method blanks. The trip and field blanks were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs)by EPA Method 8260. Laboratory method blanks were analyzed for all of the analytes included in the monitoring program. During the monitoring period, no VOCs were detected in any of the QA/QC blanks. A duplicate sample was collected from wellMW-8A and was labeledMW-DUP. Duplicate test results are presented along with the primary data in Table 2. Comparison of the primary and duplicate sample results, when both results are measurable concentrations above the practical quantitation limit(PQL) indicates good agreement (within 5%). Review of sampling dates and laboratory analytical certificates indicates that all of the laboratory analyses were completed within required holding times. Based on the results of the laboratory QA/QC analyses, it is concluded that generally acceptable c:\2011-oosl\Fc_zsAu.auc 2Geo-Logic Associates