Laserfiche WebLink
Water Quality Monitoring Report <br /> French Camp Landfill <br /> May 9, 2013. As shown on Table 6, methane was not detected in any of the soil-pore <br /> gas probes,and as a result, no samples were collected. <br /> 6.0 SUMMARY <br /> During the monitoring period,groundwater quality conditions beneath the French Camp <br /> Landfill are generally similar to those observed in previous monitoring periods. <br /> Inorganic CLs were exceeded for chloride in the samples from wells MW-9B and MW- <br /> 10A; and for pH value, specific conductance, and TDS in the sample from well MW-10A. <br /> However, none of the constituents that exceeded a CL exhibited a statistically significant <br /> increasing trend. In January 2005 a No Release Demonstration (NRD) for groundwater <br /> monitoring well MW-10A was performed (Herst,2005) in response to CL exceedances of <br /> chloride and TDS. The NRD concluded that French Camp Landfill, located within the <br /> central Stockton area, has been impacted by saltwater intrusion and the elevated <br /> chloride and TDS concentrations measured in well MW-10A are believed to be the result <br /> of this condition and not the result of landfill-related impacts. <br /> During the monitoring period, chloroform and TCFM were measured above the PQL in <br /> the samples collected from background well MW-6A and compliance well MW-9A, <br /> respectively. Confirmation sampling was not performed since chloroform and TCFM <br /> have already been confirmed in these wells. However, given the distance of well MW- <br /> 6A from the landfill, the chloroform concentrations recently measured in well MW-6A <br /> are not believed to be the result of a release from the landfill. The TCFM concentrations <br /> measured in well MW-9A are well below risk-based concentrations and have been <br /> attributed to LFG. Results of trend analysis performed on these constituents indicate no <br /> statistically significant increasing trends. In addition, trace-level concentrations of 1,2- <br /> .dichloroethane and toluene were measured in the sample from well MW-913. In <br /> response, the RWQCB was notified of the non-statistical exceedance in well MW-913 in a <br /> letter dated June 23, 2014 and confirmation samples were collected in June 2014. <br /> The results of water quality analyses completed from the surface water monitoring <br /> stations are generally consistent with previous results. With the exception of VOCs <br /> related to drinking water disinfection (trihalomethanes) measured at both upgradient <br /> and downgradient surface water monitoring stations, no VOCs were detected during the <br /> monitoring period. However, since VOCs were measured at quantifiable concentrations <br /> in the sample from SW-3, the RWQCB was notified of the non-statistical exceedance at <br /> SW-3 and conformation samples were collected in June 2014. A comparison of <br /> upstream (SW-1 and SW-2) to downstream (SW-3) surface water samples indicates <br /> generally similar inorganic constituent concentrations between upstream and <br /> downstream surface water monitoring locations, suggesting that the landfill is not <br /> impacting surface water quality. <br /> Field screening results from soil-pore gas monitoring probes indicate that no methane <br /> was measured in soil-pore gas monitoring probes during the monitoring period. <br /> M:\2014.0012\FC 1SA14.doc 6 <br /> 7/10/2014,Rev.0 <br />