My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2015_1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MANTHEY
>
0
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440006
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2015_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 12:12:02 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:07:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2015_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440006
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0004515
FACILITY_NAME
FRENCH CAMP LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
MANTHEY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95231
APN
16307035
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
MANTHEY RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440006_0 MANTHEY_2015_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Water Quality Monitoring Report <br /> French Camp Landfill <br /> Weekly site visits were conducted by French Camp Landfill personnel during the monitoring <br /> period. Records of the French Camp Landfill inspections are on file at the Republic Services <br /> Forward Landfill Field Office. Weekly site visit summary reports for the monitoring period are <br /> also presented in Appendix A. According to these weekly reports, the French Camp Landfill <br /> Operations Manager certifies that standard observations were conducted during the <br /> monitoring period (see signed "Certification Statement" included in Appendix A). <br /> 3.0 SOLID WASTE MONITORING <br /> The French Camp Landfill has been formally closed and no longer receives waste. <br /> 4.0 WATER QUALITY MONITORING <br /> 4.1 Sampling and Laboratory Analyses <br /> All of the groundwater and leachate monitoring wells and surface water monitoring stations <br /> were sampled on August 28, 2015. Quarterly depth-to-water and stream gauging were <br /> performed on August 28 and November 6, 2015. <br /> A single sample set was collected from each sampling point (groundwater, leachate, and <br /> surface water) and analyzed by BC Laboratories for the parameters stipulated in RWQCB Order <br /> No. 115-2007-0046, as summarized in Table 1. Water quality samples were also analyzed in the <br /> field for oxidation-reduction potential, turbidity, temperature, specific conductance, and pH <br /> and these field measurements were recorded on well data sheets. The groundwater and <br /> leachate monitoring wells and surface water monitoring points were sampled by Del-Tech <br /> Geotechnical Support Services (Del-Tech) in accordance with the sampling and analysis <br /> procedures detailed in Appendix B. Well data sheets, raw laboratory data, certificates of <br /> analyses, and chain-of-custody records for the sampling program are included in Appendix C. <br /> The laboratory analyses and field results for groundwater wells and surface water sampling <br /> stations are summarized in Tables 2 through 5. <br /> 4.2 QA/QC Results <br /> The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program completed for the monitoring event <br /> included analyses of one duplicate sample, one trip blank sample, one field blank sample, and <br /> laboratory method blanks. The field and trip blanks were analyzed for VOCs by EPA method <br /> 82608. Laboratory method blanks are analyzed for all of the analytes included in the <br /> monitoring program. During the monitoring period, no VOCs were detected in blank samples. <br /> Trace concentrations of calcium and potassium were measured in the method blank. However, <br /> these metals were measured at very low concentrations that did not effect the interpretation <br /> of primary sample results. <br /> A duplicate sample was collected from well MW-913 and labeled DUP. Duplicate test results are <br /> presented along with the primary data in Table 2. Comparison of the primary and duplicate <br /> sample results indicates that there was good agreement with a relative percent difference <br /> Project No.2015.0014 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.