Laserfiche WebLink
IL EROSION WORKSHEET Geography Gersmehl L <br /> Sol) erosion can occur only when wind or rain strikes an exposed S L O P E L E N G T 11 I N H E T E R S <br /> and erodible soil on a suitable slo e. 'The Universa) Soil loss PERCENT <br /> p SLOPE 2S 60 100 150 200 250 300 400 500 <br /> Equation Is a tool for predicting sheet (not gully) erosion due <br /> to rainfall -- It Is based on the fact that erosion depends on 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 <br /> 2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.2 <br /> the cooperation of at least five different factors: 6 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.S 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.7 <br /> R - the Intensity of rainfall expected in a region 8=- 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.2 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.6 4.0 <br /> K - the inherent erodibillty of the soil on the site 10 1.3 1.8 2.5 . 3.1 3.6 4.0 4.3 5.0 5.6 <br /> S - the angle, geometry, and length of-the slope 12 1.7 2.3 3.3 4.1 4.7 5.2 5.7 6.6 7.4 <br /> C - the protective cover of living or dead vegetation 14 2.1 3.0 4.2 5.2 6.0 6.7 7.3 8.5 9.5 <br /> P - the eroslon-control practices of the land user 16 2.6 3.7 S.3 6.4 7.4 8.3 9.1 11 12 <br /> The erosion that is likely to occur under a given combination of to 3.2 4.S 6.4 . 7.8 9.1 10 I1 13 iS <br /> conditions Is determined by looking up the five factors on these 20 3.8 5.4 7.7 9.4 11 12 14 16 18 <br /> tables and map and then multiplying them together. For example, <br /> suppose a farmer In central Illinois (R = 400) uses a rotation of Percent slope Is radii to the vertical change Imeters per 100 <br /> corn and soybeans with some residues left on the land (C = 0.30). meters of horizontal distance; one meter Is approximately 3.3 feet <br /> The sandy loam soil has 3% humus (K 25), the field has a 4% <br /> slope that Is '150 meters long (S = 0.8). and the farmer plows up <br /> and down hill with no concern for conservation (P = 1.0). When ORGANIC MATTER <br /> you multiply the five factors together, the estimated erosion Is SOIL TEXTURE OX 3I 6S <br /> between 20 and 30.metric tons per hectare per year (multiply by C R E S I o u E C 0 Y E R <br /> 044 to get.the answer In short tons per acre, round off to one coarse sand .06 .04 .02 LAND USE none 1/4 3/4 <br /> signlflcant'figure to be honest about the method's accuracy, and medium sand .12 .09 .06 <br /> remember that an:inch of soil weighs a hundred tons per acre), fine sang .20 .15 .10. smooth Dare ground 1 .0 .60 .20 <br /> loamy sand .16 .12 .08 rough bare ground .70 .40 .15 <br /> loamy fine sand .25 .20 .IS soybeans or cotton .60 .35 .20 <br /> 3,� Estimate the sheet'eroslon from a 200-meter 8% slope with continuous corn .. .50... .25 .10 <br /> I <br /> loam .30" .25 .20 corn-so <br /> :7 0 o an norganlc'loam in central Alabama, if the farmer grew cotton fine sandy loam, .3S .30 -25 y rotation .55 . ,.30 •15 <br /> f/ S and let cattle graze the residues on contour terraces (the most 1049 .40 .3S .30 small grains .25 .10 AS <br /> L ` H - •�^ expensive and effective erosion-control practice you could use silt loam .55 .45 .35 corn-grain rotation .3S .20 .07 <br /> and stili make money In a normal year), slit .65 .55 .4S legume-grass hay .15 .06 .03 <br /> ` <br /> = � 0 silty cly loam .45 .35 .25 corn-grain-hay rot. .20 .10 .05 <br /> a <br /> S ; 6 Does a comparison of these two situations support the popular silty clay .35 .30 .25 dry-farmed grain .40 .20 .10 <br /> textbook explanation of abandoned southern fields as products of sandy clay .20 AS .10 overgrazed pasture .25 .10 .05 <br /> farming techniques that were Inferior to those In the Midwest? clay loam .30 .25 .20 managed pasture .10 .05 .02 <br /> P a y clay .25 .20 .15 grazedeforrestsland .08 .01 02 <br /> Decrease the K-factor by about 1/5 dense forest .03 .01 .002 <br /> for good soil structure; Increase It <br /> by i/5 for poor structure. Residue cover should be evaluated In terms <br /> of Its ability to: <br /> 100 al remain In place during high winds <br /> ' 100 200 b) protect the surface from rain Impact <br /> c) Impede the downslope movement of water <br /> ~�� l EROS10H - C011TR0L PRACTICE <br /> less r PERCENT <br /> than ^ SLOPE STRAIGHT COiITOUR C011-STRIP CON-STRIP EOIIIOUR <br /> 100 400 UP HILLS PLOWING ROW/GRAI11 ROWJIIAY TERRACE <br /> r i 2 1.0 0.60 0.40 0.30 0.20 <br /> t 4 1.0 0.50 0.35 0.25 0.15 <br /> rl 600 6 1.0 0.55 0.40 0.30 0.20 <br /> 8 1.0 0.60 0.45 0.35 0.25 <br /> 12 1.0 0.70 0.50 0.40 0.30 <br /> .� 16 1.0 0.80 0.60 0.45 0.35 <br /> 1-( 800 �° 20 1.0 0.90 0.70 0.50 0.40 <br /> / t -00 factors for erosion-control practices are valid only If the <br /> terraces or contour strips are designed and built properly <br /> 200 800100 <br /> 400 600 <br /> l Figure 3 <br />