My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1991_1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TURNER
>
1333
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440009
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1991_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2020 2:59:17 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:12:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1991_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440009
PE
4445
FACILITY_ID
FA0000428
FACILITY_NAME
CENTRAL VALLEY WASTE SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
1333
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
TURNER
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
SEE COMMENTS
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1333 E TURNER RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4445_PR0440009_1333 E TURNER_1991_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
plants were observed on the project site and these were only prevalent along fence rows. Loss <br /> of a single small valley oak is not considered a significant impact. However, CDFG, CNPS and <br /> other concerned groups advocate the preservation of oaks, so the project site's valley oak should <br /> be retained if possible. Alternatively, a small number of replacement valley oaks could be <br /> planted in the park setting adjacent to the project site. <br /> Although a proper jurisdictional wetlands delineation (per U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br /> criteria) was not performed by PAR as a part of this survey, there were no potential wetlands <br /> observed on the project site. <br /> Indirect impacts of the proposed project on the study area should be less-than-significant. <br /> During construction ambient noise would be raised to levels above those normally existing in <br /> the area. Elevated noise levels would discourage birds such as great blue herons and great <br /> egrets from nesting in the vicinity. However, the study area is already bounded by a trailer park <br /> and the existing transfer station. Wildlife currently using the study area have probably already <br /> habituated to urban background noise, and the park setting provides a buffer zone to at least half <br /> of the riparian woodland in the study area where nesting would most likely occur. <br /> The CDFG and USFWS have voiced ongoing concerns about the impacts of development <br /> on breeding raptors in California. In the study area, Swainson's hawks are of particular concern <br /> to agency biologists (but are not the only species of concern). As planned, the proposed project <br /> should not generate significant impacts to breeding Swainson's hawks or other breeding raptors. <br /> There is no nesting habitat on the project site for any sensitive raptor species except for <br /> burrowing owls, and no owl burrows were detected during the survey. The loss of potential <br /> raptor foraging acreage, while close to the Mokelumne River, is not extensive or valuable <br /> enough to be considered a significant impact. However, ambient noise and construction <br /> activities could disturb raptors nesting in the riparian habitat adjacent to the proposed project <br /> site. Less-than-significant impacts to breeding raptors could be insured by conducting a spring <br /> nest survey in the study area prior to the onset of any spring or summer construction activities. <br /> RECOAMENDED AIMGATION <br /> o Retain or replace valley oak. If possible, the six-inch valley oak <br /> on the project site should be retained on-site. If this proves <br /> impossible, the tree should be replaced in the study area, <br /> preferably in the park setting adjacent to the project site. The <br /> replacement ratio should be five 15-gallon trees for the existing <br /> tree that will be removed. <br /> Replacement oaks should be cared for in an appropriate manner. <br /> They should not be placed in areas where overwatering will occur <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.