COMPLIANCE INFO_1987-2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mitigation measures or alternatives OWusly found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or r 4. Mitigation measures or alternatives which were not previously considered in the EIR would substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the environment. 2. 1:1 PREPARE AND APPROVE OR RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A PROPOSi NEGATIVE • "• • -• on • '• r • • The City of Stockton Community Development Department, Planning Division, has independently reviewed and considered the proposed project and has prepared and/or independently reviewed and analyzed the related Environmental Information/Initial Study Form. Based on the project description and/or modifications, mitigation measures, and related substantial supporting evidence presented in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, approval of a Ngglative Declaration is recommended for this project. A Mitigation Agreement is attached to the Proposed Negative Declaration, if applicable. 3. REQUIRE PREPAMT10N QF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPQRT (Based on Following r r: The City of Stockton Community Development Department, Planning Division, has independently reviewed and considered the proposed project and has prepared and/or independently reviewed and analyzed the related Environmental Information/initial Study Form. Based on the project description and/or on the related substantial supporting evidence presented in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project, either individually or cumulatively, may have a significant effect(s) on the environment which may/will not be mitigated to a less -than -significant level. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), a Subsequent EIR, or a Supplement to an. EIR, as applicable, is required for this project. If a "Project EIR" or "Program EIR" was previously prepared, it has been determined that one or more of the circumstances which require a Subsequent EIR (Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines) will be applicable to the proposed later activity. (Pur ;cant to the State and City Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, the determination of the Community Development Dire ;tor may be appealed to the City Planning Commission by submitting a written appeal with the applicable fee to the Community Development Department within ten (10) calendar days following this date of the determination.) .JOHN CARLSON, DIRECTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT By Date (Date of Determination) T:\PLANNING\ENVFORMS\IS\EISFORM:WPD 14 Revised 12/97