Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE III.D.4 ANALYSIS OF HOURLY WEEKEND PUBLIC TRAFFIC AND QUEING <br /> A. HOURLY PROJECTIONS STACKING AVAILABLE 45 spaces <br /> FOUR 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 q455 <br /> 8/22/92 Data> 36 38 50 56 82 56 54 52 31%INCREASE <br /> 5% 38 40 53 59 86 59 57 55 3310% 40 42 55 62 90 62 59 57 3420% 43 46 60 67 98 67 65 62 37 <br /> 30% 47 49 65 73 107 73 70 68 40 592 <br /> 40% 50 53 70 78 115 78 76 73 43 637 <br /> 50% 54 57 75 84 123 84 81 78 47 683 <br /> 60% 58 61 80 90 131 90 86 83 50 728 <br /> 70% 61 65 85 95 139 95 92 88 53 774 <br /> 80% 65 68 90 101 148 101 97 94 56 819 <br /> Tatem A: Base data from 8/22192 was used because it was the maximum data recieved from the County for Saturdays and Sundays from 8/1/92 to 1/24192. <br /> Peaksnear midday and distribution of hourly traffic was similar for other weekend data reviewed. <br /> 8. STACKING ENCOUNTERED FOR 46 SECOND GATE TIMEIVEHICLE <br /> HOUR 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 <br /> 8/22192 Data> -44 -42 -30 -24 2 -22 -26 -28 -49 <br /> %INCREASE <br /> 5% -42 -40 -28 -21 6 -15 -23 -25 -47 <br /> 10% -40 -38 -25 -18 10 -8 -21 -23 -46 <br /> 20% 37 -34 -20 -13 18 6 -10 -18 -43 <br /> 30% 33 31 -15 -7 27 19 10 3 -40 <br /> 40% -30 -27 -10 -2 35 33 29 22 -15 <br /> 50% 26 23 5 4 17 <br /> . ....:.... . <br /> 60% 22 19 0 10> 3.61 S7t) . 77-::::,-'.. $0 ' <br /> 70% 19 15 5 2080 95 107: '115 88: <br /> 80% 15 12 10 31 98 949 136 150 <br /> Table t3: Assumes that 80 vehicles per hour area processed. <br /> C. STACKING ENCOUNTERED FOR 30 SECOND GATE TIMEIVEHICLE <br /> HOUR 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 <br /> 8/22!92 -84 -82 -70 -64 -38 -64 56 -68 -89 <br /> INCREASE <br /> 5% -82 -80 -68 -61 34 -61 -63 -65 -87 <br /> 10% -80 -78 -65 -58 30 -58 -61 -63 -86 <br /> 20% -77 -74 -60 -53 -22 53 55 -58 83 <br /> 30% -73 -71 55 -47 -13 -47 50 -52 -80 <br /> 40% -70 -67 -50 42 5 -42 -44 -47 -77 <br /> 50% -66 53 45 36 3 -33 39 42 -74 <br /> 60% -62 59 -40 30 11 -19 34 37 -70 <br /> 70% 59 55 35 -25 19 5 -28 -32 -67 <br /> 80% 55 52 -30 -19 28 8 -14 -26 -64 <br /> Table C: 1. Assumes that 120 vehicles per tour area processed. <br /> 2. Negatisve numbers are a mutt of mathematical formula only and represent zero vehicle dacIft for that tour. <br /> d:"jU is cak,pwkmc(raw 59)ver 19-Aug-93 <br />